Joe, Chris,
thanks for reviewing. Pushed.
/Claes
On 2016-01-31 17:13, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 31 Jan 2016, at 00:58, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
On 2016-01-30 19:35, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
The change looks okay in that the new code is limited to the jrt protocol. I
assume the failing test
> On 31 Jan 2016, at 00:58, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-01-30 19:35, joe darcy wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The change looks okay in that the new code is limited to the jrt protocol. I
>> assume the failing test
>>
>>java/net/URL/B5086147.java
>>
>> passes again with this change
