Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

On 18/01/2016 19:26, Chris Hegarty wrote: On 18 Jan 2016, at 16:20, Claes Redestad > wrote: On 2016-01-18 15:34, Chris Hegarty wrote: On 18/01/16 14:09, Alan Bateman wrote: On 17/01/2016 15:30, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, please review this patch which mi

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

> On 18 Jan 2016, at 16:20, Claes Redestad wrote: > > On 2016-01-18 15:34, Chris Hegarty wrote: >> On 18/01/16 14:09, Alan Bateman wrote: >>> >>> On 17/01/2016 15:30, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, please review this patch which might make URI.toURL more efficient Webrev:

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

On 2016-01-18 15:34, Chris Hegarty wrote: On 18/01/16 14:09, Alan Bateman wrote: On 17/01/2016 15:30, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, please review this patch which might make URI.toURL more efficient Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8147462 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

On 18/01/16 14:09, Alan Bateman wrote: On 17/01/2016 15:30, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, please review this patch which might make URI.toURL more efficient Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8147462 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147462 This patch exploits the fact tha

Re: RFR: 8147462: URI.toURL could be more efficient for most non-opaque URIs

On 17/01/2016 15:30, Claes Redestad wrote: Hi, please review this patch which might make URI.toURL more efficient Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8147462 Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147462 This patch exploits the fact that URI will apply the same validation t