On 05/01/2016 22:47, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
please review this patch to cleanup URI$Parser to help URI
construction when run with the interpreter, mostly by inlining
wrapping methods:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146526
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/81465
Hi Volker,
On 5 Jan 2016, at 17:49, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can somebody please review this small test fix:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8146482/
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146482
This change looks good to me.
-Chris.
> The java/net/SocketOpt
On 5 Jan 2016, at 22:47, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please review this patch to cleanup URI$Parser to help URI construction when
> run with the interpreter, mostly by inlining wrapping methods:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146526
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.n
On 6 Jan 2016, at 02:22, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> This core-libs-dev RFR
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-December/037847.html
>
> was already approved on core-libs-dev but I would like to make sure there is
> no objection from the net-dev community.
No objectio
Hi Felix,
On 6 Jan 2016, at 05:09, Felix Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>please review the fix for java/net/ipv6tests/TcpTest.java, which replaces
> hard-coded ports with dynamic free ports on runtime.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140472
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~x
Hi all,
please review the fix for java/net/ipv6tests/TcpTest.java, which replaces
hard-coded ports with dynamic free ports on runtime.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140472
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xiaofeya/8140472/webrev.00
Thanks,
Felix
This core-libs-dev RFR
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-December/037847.html
was already approved on core-libs-dev but I would like to make sure there is no
objection from the net-dev community.
Thanks,
Brian
Hi,
please review this patch to cleanup URI$Parser to help URI construction
when run with the interpreter, mostly by inlining wrapping methods:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146526
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8146526/webrev.01
This is motivated by Jigsaw whe
Hi Alan,
Sorry for the confusion. Let me be more detailed on the issue.
In previous version of the patch, I added an initializer in SocketImpl.java to
load the libnet.so since the isReusePortAvailable and its native implementation
were there. Then, this time, I tried to move isReusePortAvailabl
Hi,
can somebody please review this small test fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~simonis/webrevs/2016/8146482/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146482
The java/net/SocketOption/OptionTest test chooses the first network
interface returned by NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces() for
doi
Hi Lucy,
I've just looked at the javadoc of MulticastSocket. It has this sentence:
* When the socket is created the
* {@link DatagramSocket#setReuseAddress(boolean)} method is
* called to enable the SO_REUSEADDR socket option.
but it doesn't mention SO_REUSEPORT. Could you please
On 05/01/2016 04:32, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
Hi Alan/Volker,
I just found out that the code works by adding the same static block (net
library loading) into SocketImpl.java although isReusePortAvailable() is being
defined in its subclass AbstractPlainSocketIml.java. I use a print statement to
con
On 04/01/2016 19:24, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
:
2. Regarding to the code snippet in net_util_md.c, the reason I check for
ENOPROTOOPT is to enable SO_REUSEPORT in the situation that the feature is
supported but something else happens during se
On 05/01/2016 00:54, Mark Sheppard wrote:
Hi,
as per feedback below webrev has been updated
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~msheppar/8134577/webrev.06/
change summary:
* List nameServices replaced with Nameservice nameService
* references to nameServices removed
* private interface NameServic
14 matches
Mail list logo