On May 5, 1:32pm, sbaid...@redhat.com (Stanislav Baiduzhyi) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: DNS resolution fails after resolv.conf update
| Hi Christos,
|
| On Monday 04 May 2015 21:16:40 Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > I don't think it is the job of the JDK to handle this. For example
| > many systems (like
On Monday 04 May 2015 22:26:26 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> not sure how I feel about the res_init(). Depending on the backends
> used this might be expensive. Especially since it wont be rate
> limited. The negative-ttl of 10s is for single records I thing. So at a
> minimum you should rate-limit res_
Hi Christos,
On Monday 04 May 2015 21:16:40 Christos Zoulas wrote:
> I don't think it is the job of the JDK to handle this. For example
> many systems (like NetBSD for example) work just fine without
> needing this, because their libc keeps track of resolv.conf changes.
Normally I would agree wit
