On 12/09/14 12:47, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Hello,
A short question out of couriosity, why is the code for the v6 and v4 case
different, anyway?
This is legacy code using Windows APIs that predate IPv6 support in the
platform. There is a huge opportunity for cleanup and modernization
here. H
Hello,
A short question out of couriosity, why is the code for the v6 and v4 case
different, anyway?
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hegarty
To: OpenJDK Network Dev list
Sent: Fr., 12 Sep 2014 11:05
Subject: Re: RFR [9] 8058216: NetworkInterf
Looks fine to me
Michael
On 12/09/14 10:05, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 11/09/14 14:42, Chris Hegarty wrote:
A small issue was found when running JCK tests on modern Windows
platforms, that have IPv6 enabled, but forced to run with the IPv4
Stack, -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true.
NetworkInterfa
On 11/09/14 14:42, Chris Hegarty wrote:
A small issue was found when running JCK tests on modern Windows platforms,
that have IPv6 enabled, but forced to run with the IPv4 Stack,
-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true. NetworkInterface.getHardwareAddress() can
return a zero length byte array, where
