On 8 Apr 2014, at 13:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> On 8 Apr 2014, at 12:12, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> One thing to avoid consider is the ContentHandler javadoc. It contains this:
>>
>> " By default it looks in sun.net.www.content, ..."
>>
>> but this is JDK-specific location and s
java.net.URLConnection.getContent() incorrectly specifies the default location
of content handler classes as sun.net.www.content. ( this location is
implementation specific )
"If no content handler factory has yet been set up, or if the factory's
createContentHandler method
returns null
Could I get the following reviewed please?
In addition to providing generic support for java.net.SocketOption,
it also includes 8032808, which implements a platform specific
socket option SO_FLOW_SLA (in jdk.net)
There are changes to two repos:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8036979/jdk/0
On 4/8/2014 6:15 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Updated webrev to include Mandy’s and Alan’s comments:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039362/02/webrev/
Thanks for the update. line 238: I wonder if this should fall back to
use the default built-in table - really minor one as this happens
Updated webrev to include Mandy’s and Alan’s comments:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039362/02/webrev/
On 7 Apr 2014, at 22:50, Mandy Chung wrote:
> ….
>
> line 225: since content-types.properties is moved to the same package as
> MimeType class, you can simply use the relative path
On 08/04/2014 13:50, Chris Hegarty wrote:
:
Yes, this is a legacy bug. It is related to the location of specific content
type handlers, and as such a separate issue. I would like to handle it
separately so as not to confuse the changes being proposed for this 8039362.
I’ll file a new JIRA bug
On 8 Apr 2014, at 12:12, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Chris,
>
> One thing to avoid consider is the ContentHandler javadoc. It contains this:
>
>" By default it looks in sun.net.www.content, ..."
>
> but this is JDK-specific location and so shouldn't be in the javadoc.
Yes, this is a legacy bug.
Chris,
One thing to avoid consider is the ContentHandler javadoc. It contains this:
" By default it looks in sun.net.www.content, ..."
but this is JDK-specific location and so shouldn't be in the javadoc.
-Alan.
On 07/04/2014 19:54, Chris Hegarty wrote:
[ Including Alex; there is a question/confirmation related to a change he
pushed, that needs his input ]
Hi Erik, thanks for your feedback, comments inline…
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8039362/01/webrev/
Looks like JDK-71537
Hello Chris,
Build part looks good to me now.
/Erik
On 2014-04-07 20:54, Chris Hegarty wrote:
[ Including Alex; there is a question/confirmation related to a change he
pushed, that needs his input ]
Hi Erik, thanks for your feedback, comments inline…
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.j
10 matches
Mail list logo