hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7021280: SocketPermission should accept wildcards

2011-07-18 Thread chris . hegarty
Changeset: 8bbea505b060 Author:chegar Date: 2011-07-18 22:25 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/8bbea505b060 7021280: SocketPermission should accept wildcards Reviewed-by: michaelm ! src/share/classes/java/net/SocketPermission.java + test/java/net/SocketPermissio

Re: SocketPermission's implies() interesting behavior

2011-07-18 Thread Michael McMahon
Looks fine, - Michael. On 18/07/11 13:25, Chris Hegarty wrote: Michael, Can you please review this change. It has already been discussed and agreed, I just rebased it against jdk8 and added a test. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7021280/webrev.02/webrev/ Thanks, -Chris. On 07/13/11 04

Re: SocketPermission's implies() interesting behavior

2011-07-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
Michael, Can you please review this change. It has already been discussed and agreed, I just rebased it against jdk8 and added a test. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/7021280/webrev.02/webrev/ Thanks, -Chris. On 07/13/11 04:07 AM, Charles Lee wrote: On 07/12/2011 07:03 PM, Chris Hegarty

hg: jdk8/tl/jdk: 7068059: Update jdk/test/ProblemList.txt

2011-07-18 Thread alan . bateman
Changeset: cbfc7f910af3 Author:alanb Date: 2011-07-18 13:10 +0100 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cbfc7f910af3 7068059: Update jdk/test/ProblemList.txt Reviewed-by: mchung, chegar ! test/ProblemList.txt

Re: Socket InputStream.available may return a positive value after shutdown

2011-07-18 Thread Chris Hegarty
On 07/18/11 09:09 AM, Jing LV wrote: Hi Chris, Alan, Thanks for reply. I am looking for a conclusion and solution for this issue. If I understand correctly, it'd fix the spec rather than fix the code? The current plan of record is to clarify the spec to indicate that available will return 0 a

Re: Socket InputStream.available may return a positive value after shutdown

2011-07-18 Thread Jing LV
Hi Chris, Alan, Thanks for reply. I am looking for a conclusion and solution for this issue. If I understand correctly, it'd fix the spec rather than fix the code? 于 2011-7-14 17:00, Chris Hegarty 写道: On 07/14/11 09:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: Chris Hegarty wrote: : I can't see that an