Re: Heads up: Bad changeset rollback

2008-09-04 Thread Brad Wetmore
The current policy is still one putback per bugid. There have been other really good reasons to allow more than one (pre-built JCE binaries), but so far no change in the policy. I still do wish it were changed, as filing a separate bug just to do a JCE build is wasted work, IMHO. > Although

Re: Heads up: Bad changeset rollback

2008-09-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:23 +0800, Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: > The bug id should have been 6740833. Aha! The 7 and 4 got swapped. Thanks. And the jcheck scripts would then have prevented that bug to ever get fixed again. Although I guess you could reuse the swapped bug number for that one then :)

hg: jdk7/jsn/jdk: 6692802: HttpCookie needs to support HttpOnly attribute

2008-09-04 Thread jean-christophe . collet
Changeset: eb342082e2b6 Author:jccollet Date: 2008-09-04 15:26 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jsn/jdk/rev/eb342082e2b6 6692802: HttpCookie needs to support HttpOnly attribute Summary: Added HttpOnly tag support to HttpCookie class. Reviewed-by: chegar, michaelm ! src/sh

Re: Heads up: Bad changeset rollback

2008-09-04 Thread Max (Weijun) Wang
The bug id should have been 6740833. Max On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:26 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:16 -0700, Mark Reinhold wrote: Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:08:38 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last night there was a changeset introduced to the JSN gate that contained an

Re: Heads up: Bad changeset rollback

2008-09-04 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:16 -0700, Mark Reinhold wrote: > > Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:08:38 -0700 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Last night there was a changeset introduced to the JSN gate that > > contained an incorrect changeset comment. Rather than pollute the > > changeset history for

Re: Heads up: Bad changeset rollback

2008-09-04 Thread Mark Reinhold
> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:08:38 -0700 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Last night there was a changeset introduced to the JSN gate that > contained an incorrect changeset comment. Rather than pollute the > changeset history for everyone, we're going to rollback this changeset, > and have the author