Re: UrlEncodedQueryString CCC request

2007-11-01 Thread Richard Kennard
Marc, > The builder is strictly that, a builder, so I'm not sure if it makes sense to add read capabilities to it Agreed. I actually don't think these two classes (UriBuilder and UrlEncodedQueryString) overlap much. How about I propose this as a direction: 1. JSR-311's UriBuilder plans to

Re: UrlEncodedQueryString CCC request

2007-11-01 Thread Marc Hadley
On Nov 1, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Michael McMahon wrote: I wonder if you have an opinion on the points/questions raised below? I'd like to get agreement on the general shape of the API before anyone goes off and reworks the existing proposal. Some comments interspersed below. Michael McMahon wrot

Re: UrlEncodedQueryString CCC request

2007-11-01 Thread Michael McMahon
Marc & Paul, I wonder if you have an opinion on the points/questions raised below? I'd like to get agreement on the general shape of the API before anyone goes off and reworks the existing proposal. Thanks Michael. Michael McMahon wrote: I agree with most of the suggestions below. The main thi