Has anyone taken classes from IT U before, this seems like a good deal but I'd
like to get someone's feedback if the classes are actually decent.
- Original Message -
From: "JC Dill"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 6:19:53 AM
Subject: Cisco IT class on groupon!?
http:/
outes are taken? Can the networks do load balancing
on the two connection and essentially use them as primary routes?
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
Computer and Information Science
University of Oregon
isparities-remain-between-u-s-europe/index.html
With respect to my second question, I was asking if is practical/reasonable
to keep both the connection types to same network (say AS-b) at the same
time, i.e., connect privately over a cross-connect and keep the public
connection over the IX.
Best Re
a shared switching fabric. Is this just because that shared
fabric has geographical reach, as in the case of IXReach?
I also see that links provided in this discussion show Europe based
networks that are using this peering type more often. Is this widely
accepted that US market is totally different f
AS-path translation: { OREGONUNIV UONET }
car1.Sacramento1 (metric 34363)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
Community: North_America Lclprf_100 Level3_Customer United_States
Sacramento
Originator: car1.Sacramento1
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research F
Thanks Joel for your detailed explanation. It was very informative. I have
been using routeviews for sometime, but given that I could get this amount
of information from other sources, I decided to give this a try.
On another note, do you think there is any value in checking the next hop
IP? I hav
is no single answer as different businesses may have
different pricing models. I hope the discussion can help me understand the
whole ecosystem a little bit better.
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
Computer and Information Science
University of Oregon
;settlement free" peering.
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
Computer and Information Science
University of Oregon
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:33 AM, James Bensley wrote:
> On 22 December 2015 at 16:44, Reza Motamedi
> wrote:
>
ee.
All the costs of HW, SW, personnel, administration, and perhaps
transmission between colos (including remote peering, being waved to
another location, tethering) would be the same, right?
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
Computer and Informatio
still a normal practice.
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
Computer and Information Science
University of Oregon
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
>
>
> On 23 December 2015 at 20:05, Reza Motamedi
> wrote
uld be a flag to differentiate records
showing iBGP vs eBGP.
On the same note, if we issue the commands on a router other than the
border router in San Fran, is there any difference in the output of show
commands?
Now how are things different if we actually run the commands on that
gateway ro
13 ESTAB 317d 9h 1m0 0
569704 0
192.65.184.24 513 ESTAB 54d16h26m 0 0
569704 0
tells me that 513 is peering with 20965 that city, right?
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
C
ferent ports of one
router? I think the other explanation is that there is switch (or something
that does not have IP footprint) between `From` side and `To` side. How
probable do you think this second explanation is?
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
156.2.1602 0 2828 209 i
* 65.106.7.56 3 0 2828 209 i
* 216.156.2.1652 0 2828 209 i
* 65.106.7.144 2 0 2828 209 i
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (
ect at the location of the router, or
if packets need to stay for some hops in the local AS.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015, 2:51 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 11/Mar/15 20:32, Reza Motamedi wrote:
> > Hi Nanog,
> >
> > For a research I want to distinguish the external AS peering from
.106.7.246 3 0 2828 209 i
* 65.106.7.55 3 0 2828 209 i
*> 216.156.2.1622 0 2828 209 i
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
Computer an
dd and uncommon case, but can it
help?
Best Regards
Reza Motamedi (R.M)
Graduate Research Fellow
Oregon Network Research Group
Computer and Information Science
University of Oregon
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 11/Mar/15 21:42, Reza Motamedi wrote:
>
Hi Everyone,
Currently we are planning to doing POC for some Metro Ethernet product. Any one
has testing parameter for Metro-E product ? It's ok even the testing parameter
is basic parameter.
Thanks in advance.
Reza
18 matches
Mail list logo
