Re: Hurricane Electric AS6939

Side note, they don’t support any traffic engineer aside from prepends but no complaints Besides that. On Oct 13, 2020, at 8:25 PM, Mike Hammett mailto:na...@ics-il.net>> wrote: https://bgp.he.net/AS16527 You don't appear to be on any IXes. Definitely join some IXes before buying another 10

Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that

Dido On Feb 11, 2020, at 9:03 PM, Andy Smith mailto:telephonetoughgu...@gmail.com>> wrote: Any word on what the update was for? It caused quite a jump in traffic on our network. On Tue, Feb 11, 2020, 19:06 Jared Mauch mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net>> wrote: Looking good from my perspective. Le

Re: Elephant in the room - Akamai

I don't have any insight but can confirm I am seeing the same thing. (Traffic shift back onto transit links) They did tell me they were having some bandwidth issues and are working on it. I am currently awaiting a direct PNI with them but haven't heard from them in some time. ___

Hulu Peering

Hey all, Just wondering if anyone peers with Hulu at any public exchange. I don't see anything on them in the peeringdb or anything that stands out from a google search besides it looks like they may be doing something with Equinix. Thanks

Re: internet - sparkle

Agree with this 💯 Traffic engineering is non existent making it a pain to move your traffic besides not advertising the prefix to them Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Ca By wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse wrote: >> >> Additionally, whilst not "

BGP peering question

Hello, Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that you want to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with someone from an ISP point of view. Thanks.

Re: BGP peering question

again. From: Martin Hannigan Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 5:41 PM To: craig washington Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: BGP peering question On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:12 PM, craig washington mailto:craigwashingto...@hotmail.com>> wrote: Hello, Newbie question, what criteria do you look f

AS PATH limits

Hello world. I was wondering and forgive me if this discussions has already taken place. How many AS PATHS are too many? Meaning how do we determine how many to filter on transit links or public peering links? Thanks in advance

Re: AS PATH limits

Thank you all very much for the feedback. As always it is much appreciated. From: Tom Beecher Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:01 PM To: craig washington Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: AS PATH limits Too many prepends = any more than you really need for

Regex expression

Hello all, not sure if this is the right place for this. I am not the best with Regex and was looking for an expression in a Juniper that will match on only so many numbers. Meaning, I am looking at the mpls lsp statistics "show mpls lsp transit statistics" and I only want to see the LSP's that

Peering at public exchange authentication

Hello all, Wondering your views or common practices for using authentication via BGP at public exchange locations. Just for example, lets say you peer with 5 people in the TELX in Atlanta, do you require them to all use authentication for the BGP session? Ive seem some use it and some not use

BGP next-hop self benefits

Hello everyone, Question, what are the true benefits to using the next-hop self feature, doesn't matter what vendor. Most information I see is just to make sure you have reach-ability for external routes via IBGP, but what if all your IBGP knows the eBGP links? Is there a added benefit to usi