On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:46:08PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ARIN claims they are seeing /48s routed, at least in their route tables. I
> have seen some new momentum on the allocation of /32's, don't know if that
> is in response to rules like this?? Would be awefully difficult for our
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:10:57PM -0800, Mike Lyon wrote:
> Anyways, for residential VOIP, where are we these days with E911? Are
> providers like Vonage and such providing reliable E911 when people
> call 911? That is one of the major problems I see with the residential
> realm going with VOIP of
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:44:28AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 16:20, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Cvetan Ivanov wrote:
> >>65000 and above are private as numbers and should not be seen in
> >>the global table.
> >
> >64512 & above.
>
> Indeed, the
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:28:46PM +0100, bj...@mork.no wrote:
> No you can't rely on that. But still, RFC4271 doesn't seemt to allow
> ignoring it. Which must be a bug in the RFC, or my reading of it.
> Hopefully the latter. Great if someone could correct the interpretation
> below.
>
> IMHO,
4 matches
Mail list logo
