I would say to roll your own binary hardcoded to only hit 1 IP address, and
have it held on a law enforcement approved network under the supervision of
a qualified agent. 0.02
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> Say for instance one wanted to create an "ethical botnet," how woul
Agreed, Gadi. It wouldn't be an attack if it were ethical. Technically,
that would be "load testing" or "stress testing".
Might I suggest this to help?
http://www.opensourcetesting.org/performance.php
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, John Kristoff wrote:
That's one hell of a captcha..
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Tim Nowaczyk wrote:
>
>
> On 1/28/09 11:45 AM, "Antonio Querubin" wrote:
>
> > Anyone else noticing Google's logo has been scrambled?
> >
> It was done in honor of Jackson Pollock's birthday.
>
> Cheers,
> Tim Nowaczyk
>
> --
> Ti
I think AT&T is involved now. If you still need something I can ask around.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:16 PM John Alcock wrote:
> Well,
>
> It has been a challenge. I am not sure who helped or fixed the problem,
> but now anything hosted on softlayer.com is responding.
>
> I am not sure if there
Does anyone have a contact for Google Peering / PNI?
We have a caching appliance whose BGP session has been flapping nonstop for
the past month or so. We've had a ticket open with Google since it started,
but they haven't really made any headway, or provided much of a response.
Thanks,
--
Zacha
Just an FYI Daniel, it looks like Comcast is experiencing a fairly large
routing issue, at least through parts of the Eastern and Midwestern US.
This is likely the cause.
[image: photo]
Zach Bare
Network Engineer at KINBER
<https://www.facebook.com/Keystone-Initiative-for-Network-Based-Educat
Maybe try setting up an Ookla on-site speedtest server? I believe the product
is called Speedtest Custom. Setup is pretty simple, and is relatively
inexpensive.
That gives you the ease-of-use of speedtest.net, with the accuracy similar to
having a local iperf server.
Zach Puls
Network
North American peering at AS16509 could reach
> out off-list, that would be appreciated. Myself and a few colleagues have
> attempted to reach out via the contacts listed on PeeringDB on multiple
> occasions over the last couple of months and have not been successful in
> reaching someone
We are seeing a large number of tcp reset alerts today with a source AS of
GOOGLE (15169), AMAZON-02 (16509), APPLE (714), APPLE-AUSTIN (6185),
FACEBOOK (32934) and AKAMAI-ASN1 (20940). Does any one here know if
something is going on like big os updates.
--
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA
Hello,
I know this isn't precisely on topic but I'm having an issue that I could
use some assistance with.
I'm currently seeing a very interesting issue for a single server. File
transfers from Server A to Server B are relatively slow and not using up
much of the circuit. Upon further inspectio
Hi Tony. No firewall in the way.
Physical flow is as below.
Server A -> Nexus 7k -> 3845 router -> Sprint MPLS -> 3845 router -> Cisco
3750x stack -> Server B
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> Zach Hill wrote:
>
> > What's interesting
Hi Machael,
Let me setup another packet capture at each side to see if the initial
packets are being modified at all.
Thanks,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Michael Brown
wrote:
> On 14-07-24 12:30 PM, Zach Hill wrote:
> > Hi Tony. No firewall in the way.
> >
> > Phys
n Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Zach Hill wrote:
> Hi Machael,
>
> Let me setup another packet capture at each side to see if the initial
> packets are being modified at all.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Michael Brown
> wrote:
>
>> On
//i.imgur.com/UyL3V6L.png
Now they are both communicating a window size. Speed is still slow at
400-450KBps
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Matthew Petach
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Zach Hill wrote:
>
>> Also just to reiterate I would lean more heavil
, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:08 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:33:56 -0400, Zach Hill said:
>
> > First is the SYN from Server A to Server B
> http://i.imgur.com/E5cu4ev.png
>
> Was this captured with tcpdump on Server A on its way out, or on Server B
> on its way in, or at some
I don't have root access to that server but I should be able to get it then
get some tcpdumps.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Matthew Petach
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Zach Hill wrote:
>
>> All are from SPAN ports at each end. So for
to other provider suggestions I might be missing. The potential usage site
> is about 10 miles LOS east/south-east from downtown Heber City.
>
> Thank you!
> Brandon
>
--
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA)
greenvilletowers.com
My website <http://zachunderwood.me/>
gt;>
> >> http://vyos.net/
> >>
> >> I've been playing with the development builds and it seems to be every
> >> bit as stable as the Vyatta releases.
> >>
> >> Will be interesting to see how the project unfolds :-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Patrick Soucy
> >> Network Engineer
> >> University of Maine System
> >>
> >> T: 207-561-3526
> >> F: 207-561-3531
> >>
> >> MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net
> >>
> >
>
>
--
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA)
My website <http://zachunderwood.me/>
OK. So who other than Andrew was able to get this working (and keep it
working) ?
I'm about to place an order for slow-verse for my residence...
-Z-
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> On 04/12/13 23:48, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > Please tell me what provider is selling 100Mbi
Agreed, Microsoft process is painful with forced to use the azure
interface. Meta and cloudflare have nice portals that use peeringdb for
auth.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024, 12:03 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> And so many of those bilateral processes are just simply broken.
>
>
>
> -Mike HammettIntellige
20 matches
Mail list logo
