Hi,
I came across the idea of the virtual POP , but the website for them have
way too much jargon to me[1][2][3], can someone explain it like i'm five
(:-D)?
Specifically, my question is :
1. Is virtual POP basically a L2VPN? That is, the provider will provide a
port at site A,that is somehow
t; *From:* NANOG on behalf of William Herrin <
> b...@herrin.us>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 24, 2016 12:46 AM
> *To:* Yucong Sun
> *Cc:* NANOG
>
> *Subject:* Re: What's the meaning of virtual POP ?
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Yucong Sun wrote:
> > I came a
In my setup, I use an BIRD instance to combine multiple internet full
tables, i use some filter to generate some override route to send to my L3
switch to do routing. The L3 switch is configured with the default route
to the main transit provider , if BIRD is down, the route would be
unoptimized,
use GIT_CURL_VERBOSE=1 GIT_TRACE=1 git will print out full
trace. you can also try other environment variables from
https://git-scm.com/book/tr/v2/Git-Internals-Environment-Variables
In my experiences, this is usually caused by MTU discovery issue.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Bob Evans w
opengear is just atom based linux，at least the one i used.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:29 PM Ryan Gelobter wrote:
> > +1 OpenGear all the time - just ensure you are patching/manageing
> them(!)
>
> Why do you say that? I'd love some details before buying opengear.
>
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:38
Just for the reference, here is a more complete solution for Junos (took me
a while searching the web to figure it out), hope it helps someone.
policy-options {
prefix-list lo0.0-inet-address {
apply-path "interfaces lo0 unit 0 family inet address <*>";
}
prefix-list ntp-server
Well, ain't that great day to finish the week. Some one today me a
submarine cable is cut.
Most of the networks in LAX that has peering with CU looks congested to
hell now. Anyone else here seeing the same thing?
e anyway
> to be 'legitly' ran?
>
> Price difference might be a lot smaller depending on that.
>
>
> On 8/6/2014 午後 08:30, Yucong Sun wrote:
>
>> I used ex4200 to do exactly what you did before. ex4200 releases is
>> pretty
>> rock solid, feature ex
EdgeRouter only support "hardware accelerated" routing with limited
features. If you start playing with firewall filters, gre tunnels etc you
would have to be careful about how they decrease your performance.
I personally tried to use a edgerouter to replace my j2350 with 300mbps
traffic. I first
Hi,
My recent inquiry to some network provider reveals that they are
charging fee for per /24 announced. Obvious that would means they get
to charge a lot with little to none efforts on their side.
In a world we are charging total bytes transferred instead of bps on
uplinks, i can't say I'm surpr
sKfGY/ZU7uVKdNT3OG6fon5kSv+1neXD2ekFoD5G
> NV2DqzaXq4kjIi3gfgU0PpeMpHyNsyA7iEkEGBECAAkFAlRbtw0CGwwACgkQfah7
> t6nNuuMXqQCZAfBvDdJ/9S8qK6u/yVo6t9cxtpkAn3XJsfNKK4YwRgL68p6eK8uA
> +VIJ
> =kOqh
> -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces
if that is the intent, they should charge per prefix. Not per /24 eqiv.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014, 00:20 Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Yucong Sun
>
> > My recent inquiry to some network provider reveals that they are
> > charging fee for per /24 announced. Obvious that would means they
CR one is fake, isn't it?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Nicolás wrote:
> You could try this one:
> https://thepiratebay.cr/
>
> El 22/12/14 00:28, Miles Fidelman escribió:
>> Javier J wrote:
>>> http://www.thepiratebay.se/
>>
>> Doesn't seem to be reachable, though.
>>
>
I don't understand the strategy here, how is that getting more traffic
going-through IPv6 help its adoption by the mass? IMHO it only helps
high-end, backbone type of network equipment producers sell more of
their big box with advanced IPv6 license. It has absolutely no help
with the long tail cr
This is what roaming data means, Your data packet is simply trunked to
your original operator to process. So you will be having a US ip on
the web.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Yury Shefer wrote:
> My team mate was traveling to China with his Nexus 6 (with Project Fi
> SIM-card) and was abl
I recommend http://www.quadranet.com/ ! I have been a happy customer
for almost two years,
I have a single dedicated server over there, running full BGP feed
with them, It's a fairly extensive setup with multiple sessions,
automatic null routing and all the communities tinkering! Their NOC is
ver
16 matches
Mail list logo
