On 2022-03-15 14:37, Eric Tykwinski wrote:
What I don’t understand, is why change time, just change working hours.
I’m all for giving up the time change, but the standard should probably
still be UTC offset.
If you work 9-5, change it to 10-6. Every company can post working
hours on their we
There's one other major issue faced by stub networks which I have
encountered at $DAYJOB:
- My upstream(s) refuse(s) to support IPv6
This *is* a deal breaker. The pat response of "get new upstreams" is not
helpful and shows the distinct bias among this community to the large
players who actua
Apologies if this is off topic for NANOG. I need to contact someone at
Microsoft who can correct problems with Microsoft accounts.
I've been trying unsuccessfully to disavow a Microsoft account for some
time. Note this an account someone has managed to associate with one of
my email addresses.
th to resolution.
Best regards,
Christian
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of William Astle
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 11:00 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Clueful contact at Microsoft needed
Apologies if this is off topic for NANOG. I need to co
On 14-06-18 06:16 PM, Sadiq Saif wrote:
On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote:
Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment.
Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of
residential IPv6 connectivity?
For that matter, how about on the other side of the equation. Why is
On 12-07-14 09:43 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 10:14:08 -0400, Andrew Sullivan said:
This isn't true in ICANN-contracted registries. The maximum period is
10 years, absolutely, so if you have 10 years to go and you pay for a
transfer you lose the additional year's paym
On 12-08-31 08:15 AM, Berry Mobley wrote:
Hello,
Do any of you do any color vision screening in your interview process?
How do those of you with color vision impairments compensate? I'd never
considered this until I was in one of our facilities with my son (who
has limited color vision) and we h
On 2015-09-24 10:49, Dovid Bender wrote:
The issue now is convincing clients that they need it. The other issue is many
software vendors still don't support it.
Regards,
Dovid
Actually, the issue now is convincing certain big providers to actually
make IPv6 service available to their custom
On 15-06-26 09:47 PM, tqr2813d376cjozqa...@tutanota.com wrote:
27. Jun 2015 03:06 by j...@baylink.com:
And that's the ballgame.
http://www.reddit.com/r/ipv6/comments/3b5p3i/arin_just_subdivided_their_last_1718192021_and_22
And here's to another eternity of shitty ISPs not implementing IPv6
wg.org/ has the membership application and other info.
The $4000/year minimum membership fee is a non-starter for small
organizations who are already strapped for operating cash as it is. This
is probably where the perception comes from.
--
William Astle
l...@l-w.ca
anog.org
Sent: Tue Sep 08 17:17:58 2009
Subject: Re: Repeated Blacklisting / IP reputation
ISPs can be invited and there are specific meetings for them (closed to
other members).
There're also whitepapers for ISP (and others).
But I agree, hoping ALL the ISPs join MAAWG or even hear about
There has been much talk about IPv6 lately, and for good reason.
Whatever your opinion on whether IPv6 is a good solution to IPv4 address
exhaustion, it's the only solution we have. Yet deployment, at least in
North America, has been ridiculously slow.
I have just been informed by a sales rep for
On 2011-05-11 09:10, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, ja...@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
>> I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1
>> companies that should have already been full deployed. These are also some
>> of the more expensive providers on a per Mb
13 matches
Mail list logo
