I've seen an uptick, but nothing too dramatic. Maybe 4-5 junk calls a day
- mostly afternoon.
-- Tom
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 9:57 AM Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Mine exploded since the requirement date. Some mornings I get a dozen
> before lunch.
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:33 PM Michael Thomas
Go Mike!
Seriously, Like Owen, I'm in Evergreen and until recently, my home had very
poor speeds, but at least something. Today, I have no option other than
Comcast which has jumped to mediocre, and AT&T's DSL. Seriously. I also
get better service in the Sierra's, but alas, still only one choice
Go virtual. x86 servers are still 5-8 weeks from our usual suppliers,
although some NICs are 12 weeks and DC Power Supplies are also
52-weeks/'no-idea'.
-- Tom
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 6:21 AM Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> A company I work for designs a lot of our own hardware and we’ve had a
> number
Reach out to the folks at IP Architechs (https://iparchitechs.com/),
Readitech (https://engr.readitech.com/) or any of the good PE firms and
they can help.
-- Tom
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 8:44 AM KCI Dave Logan via NANOG
wrote:
> Hi all. We operate a small regional ISP in Colorado, but no size
Anyone have any thoughts on this CUPS thing? I have a customer asking, but
it seems the lack of CP resiliency and additional latency between the DP
and CP make this a really dumb idea. Has anyone tried it? Does it make
any sense?
Thanks!
n
>
> On Mar 22, 2023, at 4:02 PM, Tom Mitchell
> wrote:
>
> Anyone have any thoughts on this CUPS thing? I have a customer asking,
> but it seems the lack of CP resiliency and additional latency between the
> DP and CP make this a really dumb idea. Has anyone tried it? Does it make
> any sense?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
; Yours,
>
> Joel
> On 3/22/2023 5:53 PM, Tom Mitchell wrote:
>
> What is it about the architecture that makes it a preferred solution. I
> get that centralizing the user databases makes sense, but why the control
> plane. What benefit does that have?
>
> -- Tom
>
&g
Lanner NCA-1516
-- Tom
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 9:15 AM Michel Blais
wrote:
> Pretty sure Ufispace S9502-12SM + IPInfusion OcNOS would work. VxLAN is
> supported in the IP Base licence. CRS license must be avoided for VxLAN.
> Look at the OcNOS feature matrix to make sure.
>
> Le mer. 14 juin 2
I don't know about specific SKUs, but IP Infusion make a very popular set
of L2 switches.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:42 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> I'm evaluating CPEs for one of my clients, a regional ISP. Currently,
> we're terminating the customer's service (L3) on our upstream equipment and
> ex
Not sure we need the FCC telling us how to build products or run networks.
Seat belts are life-or-death, but bufferbloat is rarely fatal ;-) Let it
be a point of differentiation.
-- Tom
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:56 PM Dave Taht wrote:
> Over here:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19AD
Hi Jon,
Are you dual stack? v6 would solve some of these issues?
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:20 PM Jon Lewis wrote:
> We started rolling out CGNAT about 6 months ago. It was smooth sailing
> for the first few months, but we eventually did run into a number of
> issues.
>
> Our customer base i
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 1:19 PM Jon Lewis wrote:
> I'm not so sure about that. Our customers are all offered dual-stack
> (DHCPv6, DHCPv6-PD). Do any of the common streaming services support v6
> yet? Last I checked, Hulu did not.
>
> On Tu
Beyond that, my home (c. 1996) has RJ-45 stapled to the studs every X feet,
jacks in every room, and super-fat coax similarly fastened to studs in 3
rooms. Of course, none of this is in use. How many times have I wished
they used conduit.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:43 AM Colin Stanners (lists) <
13 matches
Mail list logo
