Just did a quick test from a personal VM, no throughput difference over
direct peering, public IX, or transit. GCP might have a bottleneck in your
case though, might be a good idea to ask them.
Also, I'll have what Gordon is having.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Gordon Cook wrote:
>
>
> Hi A
Usually when someone starts griping about RTT between destinations more
than about 6 time zones apart, I start to talk to them about refraction
indicies, platform specific switching delay differences, stuff like that.
Normally I can chase them away or put them to sleep well before getting to
'I can
You should be using /126 or /127 for point to point links that touch
external networks unless you like extraneous NS messages and full neighbor
cache tables. :)
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 at 22:29, Krunal Shah wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > What subn
( Buffalo resident here.)
That's pretty much true. From Toronto down around the lake, most of the
fiber paths follow the QEW, although I think I saw a map once that had some
down the 406. The challenge then becomes the Niagara River. There are only
really 3 good points north of Niagara Falls to cr
The same way we've done it for years ; really hacky expect scripts. :)
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> Possibly a minor nit, but if the devices "don't directly support
> automation", how is the "D" part of "CI/CD" accomplished there?
> `integration -ne deployment`. Do y
Apple's peering/CDN strategy has completely changed in the last few years.
(Hi to my friends on the list here!) They do a much better job getting bits
delivered for this stuff now.
Some of the IOS coding is still occasionally not the most well thought out
when it comes to data retrieval, but it's
Too many prepends = any more than you really need for what you're trying to
accomplish. :)
I've cutoff paths as short as 4 to as long as 8 before in different jobs
for different reasons.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:33 AM, craig washington <
craigwashingto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello world.
>
>
There are also considerations with the throughput capability of the
hardware too.
500T in a couple RU is nice and all, but if the box can only push ~15Gbps
because of bottlenecks in hardware, or the kernel isn't tuned, it's might
be a lot less useful depending on the content, as Jared points out.
"But if provider 1 has its 1 fibre on the CN line and provider 2 has its
1 fibre along CP line (or road), then you can get diversity by getting
bandwidth from both."
That's not diversity. That's just a matter of time before the same backhoe
catches them both. :)
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 6:00 PM, J
As much as that would make sense, there are minimum penetration
requirements in contracts, particularly for ESPN. It's going to take a lot
of pain on all sides to change those contracts going forward to make Sports
as an extra package entirely.
On Nov 20, 2017 8:14 AM, "Matthew Black" wrote:
> R
RFC1918 isn't big enough to cover all use cases. Think about a large
internet service providers. If you have ten million customers, 10.0.0.0/8
would be enough to number modems, but what happens when you need to number
video set top boxes and voice end points? I don't think anyone goes out and
says
"Blockchain is great at proving chain of custody, but when do you need to do
that in computer networking?"
This is the most important question to ask. Everything else is just
buzzwordy shenanigans.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:52 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Glen Ke
Most VPS / hosting abuse departments are understaffed (if they exist at
all), and even when they do dig in, the last thing most of them want to do
with razor thin margins is to shut off a paying customer unless they REALLY
REALLY have to.
Noe of this should be a surprise.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at
nsense that befalls this mailing list every other
day.
Reminder: satire can be relevant.
--
Tom
ny more...
Features in the MPLS feature pack:
https://documentation.extremenetworks.com/FLR_22.4/EXOS_21_1/Feature_License_Requirements/r_feature-pack-features.shtml
And MPLS configuration (scroll down for the tree on the left):
https://documentation.extremenetworks.com/exos_22.4/EXOS_21_1/MPLS/mpls.shtml
--
Tom
CHI-NOG 08 - (Chicago Network Operators Group)
May 10th 2018, Chicago, IL
The Chicago Network Operators Group (CHI-NOG) is a vendor neutral
organization. Our goal is to create a regional community of network
professionals by presenting the latest technology trends, enabling
collaboration and provi
what will hopefully be a unique and exciting session.
Best,
Tom
--
Tom Daly
http://dyn.com/
p
to 10GE yet - the debate might give you the top 3-5 points on why each might be
the right option for you. And then, of course, there is a fun factor.
Tom
not limited by the selection of hardware manufactures, which do you
prefer? ras did a good talk on optics in the past, I'm sure there's some points
to discuss.
> A good topic might be ipv6 migration strategies: dual stack or native
> v6 with nat64/dns64
Alright, added. Are you volunteering to speak to one point or the other?
Thanks,
Tom
oint.. but again i could be wrong…
> wishing now i didn't send anything. 8)
Nah, send away. What debate were you volunteering to take a position on again?
:)
Tom
ws it down to the point where you have
little to no guesswork remaining.)
I agree that this can be highly frustrating, but it sounds more like a
hosting company unprepared for the inevitable 'oh god the sales guys
have sold servers to a ROKSO spammer!'.
Good luck. :)
Tom
to get payload information, but the traffic volume is making
it slow going setting up packet captures at these sites remotely.
Thanks in advance,
Tom
--
Thomas Beecher II
Senior Network Administrator
LocalNet Corp.
CoreComm Internet Services
tbeecher at localnet.com
I've received a couple of responses off list, and am now in touch with
Akamai directly.
I appreciate everyone's assistance.
On 1/20/2011 4:04 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
I'm looking for an Akamai contact to try and address a strange situation.
We have multiple sites across t
ize. Different floods may have different packets, but within
a flood it's identical. I wouldn't think you'd have data prior to the
3-way, so I'm curious how the 3-way is being completed for the data to
be sent.
Jack
On 1/20/2011 4:46 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
I've received
bably agree with you.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -- jra
> > --
> > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
> > j...@baylink.com
> > Designer The Things I Think RFC
> > 2100
> > Ashworth & Associates http://w
On 2014-03-13 23:13, joel jaeggli wrote:
exabgp from ripe labs can inject flowspec routes.
You mean from Exa Networks[1], not RIPE:
https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp
Tom
[1] http://www.exa.net.uk/
rvested addresses from the bounce logs, scripted up a notification to
small batches of addresses and moderated all @yahoo! addresses on the lists.
Can you say Collateral! Damage! Yahoo!
--
Tom
==
"Z80 system stack overflow. S
y it is, but when it's
just regular DDR SDRAM, I don't see any cause for concern for the few
tens of pounds it cost (versus £hundreds for Cisco's own) to find out.
Tom
in the UK (anything else is due to economics, and for
that, see B4RN[3]).
I won't claim to hold the magic recipe for ensuring fair choice for
consumers, and the UK market is far from perfect, but so far it's
sounding a hell of a lot saner than what's happening in the US.
Tom
On 13/05/14 19:01, Owen DeLong wrote:
I didn’t see the NSA telling us what we had to buy are demanding
advance approval rights on our maintenance procedures.
Because they didn't (don't) need to...?
Tom
I had lightning strikes ditch my fiber connections twice yesterday, but you
can't blame the network on the big angry hammer of Thor.
At least the poor guy who was directly below where lightning nailed our
site was already on the toilet..!!
On Jul 10, 2014 3:16 AM, "Kraig Beahn" wrote:
> Anyo
erywhere. Don't
they know how much it costs us to keep the place clean?!
Tom
I just have no faith that all the dominos are lined up in the proper
direction...
Indeed; quite hard to be trusting at this point.
Tom
v6 support (>10.2) and I'm yet to hear
about it from CPanel.
Furthermore connection tracking in RHEL/CentOS 5 is totally broken for
IPv6 if you're using it for IPv4 also...
But mostly: you just have to dive in and see what works/what doesn't.
Just don't test it on your live servers!
Tom
is in
using RFC1918 within this scenario.
Tom
oject gets caught up in the complexities of budgeting and
> contract execution.
"Can we have IPv6 transit?"
"Yes, please turn up a session to.."
That was asking Cogent for IPv6 dual-stack on our existing IPv4
transit.
I'm not saying it's any good, but it certainly didn't cost extra.
Tom
nd/or a required contract change to
protect themselves.
(Not that it's likely much to be concerned about. But then, I don't know
who your customer is. ;))
Or the more likely reality that one hand doesn't talk to the other and
everyone's getting varying answers/actions from Cogent, depending on
whom they speak with.
Tom
se global addresses
and just depend on router ACLs to protect things? How close are we to having a
central registry for unique local addresses, and will that really happen?
Tom
-----
Tom Ammon
Network Engineer
M: (801)674-9
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 16:30 +0100, Mark Blackman wrote:
> In the unlikely event no one else suggests them, I'll point you at
> NetSumo, http://www.netsumo.com/
+1, lots of clue available at Netsumo.
else fails, you could
stump-up for a RHEL license.
Personally I'm already installing 6.x hosts and shall continue to do so
where support for software exists (i.e. Plesk has no official support
for CentOS 6.x or Scientific Linux in any form as yet.)
Tom
Hi Pascal,
A friendly fyi from a former China and HK surveyor and colocator:
Topologically, China and Hong Kong are not the same place at all; in fact for
some/many requirement-site pairings, Hong Kong may not not even be the closest
place to China.
I don't think it's possible to be both suff
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 01:23 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> A transparent router (sorry, poor choice of terminology on my part) is
> a router which doesn't NAT or become selectively opaque (firewall). In
> other words, it forwards packets and it doesn't do any other arbitrary
> things to them at the wh
s about all the CCNP labs covered at
the time!)
Of course, knowing how the protocol works at a level suitable for
implementation in a critical network takes a bit longer, but you
shouldn't have any issue bootstrapping your test networks for that
purpose.
Tom
an often be seen in ##vyatta
on Freenode. :)
I find it interesting to idle/chime-in occasionally at least.
Tom
I found I had to do this many years ago on some Cisco routers to get them to
load balance (per packet) across two links. Adding 0.0.0.0/0 routes across
both links just resulted in traffic routing across one link. Broke it into
two /1's per link and it worked perfectly.
On 24 September 2011 02:12,
On Sep 25, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Manish Karir wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2011, at 6:31 PM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
>
>> Message: 9
>> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:37:17 +0300
>> From: Gadi Evron
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: "general badness" AS-based reputation system
>> Message-ID: <4e7f4aad.80
On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Manish Karir wrote:
>
> On Sep 25, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Tom Vest wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Manish Karir wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 25, 2011, at 6:31 PM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
>>>
>>>&
On 04/10/2011, at 10:08 AM, Brandon Kim wrote:
> Since we're on the topic of DoS. What best practice actions can be taken
> AFTER such an attack?
Notifying NANOG/*NOG lists? ;)
Randy,
Posting delay. Fixed.
Tom
- Original Message -
> From: "Randy Bush"
> To: "North American Network Operators' Group"
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:51:13 AM
> Subject: slides
>
> i can not seem to see slides for this morning
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 14:12 -0700, steve pirk [egrep] wrote:
> I saw this in a post from Travis Wise of Google yesterday. Pretty cool
> for
> those users who do not want to use their ISP's name servers, or just
> want to
> have dns resolve quickly from anywhere in the world. In either case, I
> thi
upstream point to point links into the rest of the network. Again, I
understand this may be undesirable from a SP perspective, but when our
'clients' are all a bunch of internal servers it makes sense to keep iBGP/IGP
as clean as possible...
Thanks,
Tom
Note the distinction in the new peering relationship requirement -- only direct
adjacencies with other transit-providing ASes count.
...or did that change happen some time ago and I'm just noticing it now (?)
TV
On Oct 13, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- a...@latency.net wrote:
> F
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 17:38 +0100, Randy Bush wrote:
> "The internet is broken"
>
> "Yes dear. Care to tell me which part?"
Was it just the bias of my nationality that prompted me to repeat this
out-loud with a posh, British accent? :)
Tom
for UMTS/GSM via
firmware and/or software updates from Samsung?
Tom
e
going to be serving NXDOMAINs for them anyway, so there's not really any
overhead introduced by supplying something generic instead...
Tom
ss at the time of
investigating said complaint; a dynamically updating DNS record like this is
really no substitution for accurate accounting records in your RADIUS system.
Tom
to 10+ year life ...)
If only the UK was as far ahead on LTE as the US!
Tom
ticular BGP 'UPDATE'
message.
(That's the running theory at least).
It's affected multiple service providers, globally, not just those
connected to TATA.
Tom
he more 'grown up' variant.
Still though, I hear bad things of the IPv6 support in pfSense. It's
"available" but not stock-standard & supported.
How does the pfSense developer attitude towards filtering the entire
Internet, IPv6 included, currently stand?
Tom
pport has
been pretty poor. I have mentioned above that customers have been asking
for such support for years (i.e. since m0n0wall had it) and the response
has been 'it's not important yet', which really wasn't true.
But, despite that, it sounds like it's finally getting better. And that
can only be good news.
Tom
oken and I need to troubleshoot things. ;-) But I guess something
> has to give.
You don't have to give up working traceroute / ping to use link-local on your
PtPs.
Our traffic routes through globally reachable router loopbacks which looks
pretty in traceroutes, are pingable and doesn't break PMTUD.
Tom
Assuming it's true, it was bound to happen. Running anything , TOR or
otherwise, that allows strangers to do whatever they want is just folly.
People will spend time and money securing their home wireless so their
neighbor can't steal their internet, but willingly allow strangers from
anywhere
y are legally
required to remove access to material and don't.
End users have no such protections that I'm aware of that cover them
similarly.
On 11/29/2012 2:50 PM, George Herbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
Assuming it's true, it was boun
ave better things to spend money on.
On 11/29/2012 3:06 PM, George Herbert wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
Not really comparable.
Speaking from a US point of view, ISPs has strong legal protections
isolating them from culpability for the actions of their custome
not taking the required
reporting/preservation/destruction actions as required by law.
And in practice, the process is:
On 11/29/2012 5:06 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:26:57 -0500
From: Tom Beecher
Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if
oped is more likely to be implemented by
old-line operators than by pure internet operations.
Tom Taylor
On 05/12/2012 4:34 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/12/05/0115214/itu-approves-deep-packet-inspection
ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection
Posted by Soulskill on Tues
Its quite easy to get MPLS-VPN connectivity into China (Pacnet, Singtel,
CPCNet, etc, will offer), but at a price.
Suzhou and Shenzhen are easily in reach of all the above listed providers.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Warren Bailey <
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> We tried
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Tom Paseka wrote:
> > Its quite easy to get MPLS-VPN connectivity into China (Pacnet, Singtel,
> > CPCNet, etc, will offer), but at a price.
>
> mpls != ipsec ... perhaps the OP w
On 05/12/2012 2:11 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2012-12-05 14:01, Tom Taylor wrote:
I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as "negotiated
behind closed doors". Any drafts were available to all participants in
the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other
Actually it's in Japanese. Nifty is one of the oldest (and at one time,
largest) access services in Japan. It's owned by owned by Fujitsu.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nifty_Corporation
http://www.nifty.co.jp/english/
From here it looks like it's originated by AS2510, which is also Fujistsu.
So
Web interface for Gmail/GChat seems to be the culprit. My email and chat
clients that don't use the web interface seem pretty uneffected.
It's Google. They'll straighten it out quick enough.
On 12/10/2012 12:00 PM, Peter Kristolaitis wrote:
I'm getting the same thing when I try to access the we
// wire pin 10 to +5v
void setup() {
pinMode(10, OUTPUT);
digitalWrite(10, LOW);
}
void loop() {
// ha ha you'll never get here, enjoy the blue smoke
}
// I like to classify my occupation as "gaff taping Arduino boards to
things till they 'work'"
Tom Morris, KG4CY
You can look at the final outcome yourself (no password needed), at
http://www.itu.int/en/wcit-12/Documents/final-acts-wcit-12.pdf
RESOLUTION PLEN/5 on page 27 (by PDF count, out of 30 pages) describes
work to be done by Study Group 3 and cooperating members. Note that the
resolution is not pa
for density too.
>
> So why, oh why, nanog the omniscient do we still use rj45's?
>
> Mike
>
--
--
Tom Morris, KG4CYX
Mad Scientist For Hire
Chairman, South Florida Tropical Hamboree / Miami Hamfest
Engineer, WRGP Radiate FM, Florida International University
786-228-7087
151.820 Megacycles
protocols bgp {
group akamai {
neighbor x.x.x.x {
family inet {
unicast;
}
family inet6 {
unicast;
}
}
}
}
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Pete Ashdown wrote:
> I've got a peer who wishes me to send my IPv6 annou
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I would push back for a slightly different reason...
>
> Any inability to forward IPv6 might not impact the IPv4 peering session and
> you might run into a situation where the peering session stays up and
> continues
> exchanging routes, but t
the "borders" between simulcasting repeater coverage areas, cell sites,
etc. Can anyone say Spaghetti mess? Ow my brain hurts.
Tom Morris, KG4CYX
Chairman, South Florida Tropical Hamboree
Mad Scientist, Miami Children's Museum
This message sent from a mobile device. Silly typos p
IGMP packets are sent with TTL=1. Is the tunnel interface on the router
enabled for PIM?
Tom
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Brian Christopher Raaen <
mailing-li...@brianraaen.com> wrote:
> Just a quick note. I do have multicast enabled on the server gre1
> interface. A tshark c
At the standards level, ANCP was designed to allow partitioning like
that. however, work on applying ANCP (Access Network Control Protocol)
to PON is just going through the IESG now, so the probability that it's
implemented in the Calix devices is remote.
Tom T
On 06/02/2013 10:56 AM
l pretty much just work for you. I'm also happy to
discuss more offline if you prefer.
Tom
Tom
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Landon Stewart wrote:
>
> Oh by vendor I mean VAR I guess. Mostly I'm also wondering how an IB
>> netw
You won't be able to get many choices there. Given its a Hutchison
building, thought about Hutchison?
You'll need a local loop otherwise, coverage is probably not easy too and
being a hutch building, you wont get much choice.
Other recommendations (if you forget about local loop issues), Pacnet,
Looks like google cache.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:08 PM, César de Tassis Filho
wrote:
> Not sure, but it looks like some Google Global Cache inside an ISP.
>
> César
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Grant Ridder >wrote:
>
> > Whois record isn't Google.
> >
> >
> > inetnum:116.92.0
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jared Mauch"
>
> > b) locking down your recursive servers to networks you control
>
> Sure. But OpenDNS, Google, and the other providers of recursive servers
> for edge cases can't do that anymore?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:06 PM, John Levine wrote:
> >>As a white-hat attempting to find problems to address through legitimate
> means, how
> >>do you …
> >
> > You make friends with people with busy authoritative servers and see
> > who'
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> But hey, this is a good thing because a DDOS caused issues, right?
> Well, not so much. Even if the exchange does not advertise the
> exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at
> least IBGP) of everyone connected to i
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's
>>> probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of
>>> everyone connected to it,
>
> yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does
> this, but i
ts
of the same size.
Tom
In what sense do you mean that? The end-user IPv6 prefix certainly ties
IPv4 and IPv6 together, hence the interest in the Light-Weight IPv4 over
IPv6 alternative.
Tom
On 08/04/2013 3:13 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
Chris,
UmmmŠ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP
I think what that screenshot is saying is that after you deploy MAP,
then if you stop using it the IPv6 addresses don't need to change. I
would assume you're not saying that you can take your IPv6 addresses as
you find them and interpret them as MAP End-user prefixes.
Tom
On 08/04
N A
;; Query time: 6 msec
;; SERVER: 195.160.166.139#53(195.160.166.139)
;; WHEN: Tue Apr 9 14:58:21 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 31
RCODE=0, Recursion available=0:
http://openresolverproject.org/search.cgi?mode=search6&search_for=195.160.166.0%2F24
Hence my question, what is it doing w
s they sent the email to and numbeds they are calling
they scraped the info from some online DB's..
Tom.
On May 24, 2013, at 3:27 AM, Paul Kelly :: Blacknight wrote:
>>>
>>> Just because I have operations in one region does not preclude me
>> from having operations
>>> in other regions. YMMV of course.
>>>
>>> /bill
>>
>> That was exactly my point, Bill... If you have operations in RIPE
Hi All,
I'm wondering, what would you say is the best DHCPv6 server for a large
enterprise? We've played with dibbler and the ISC server, and have had some
interesting (and annoying) results with the ISC server. At first blush, dibbler
appears to work better.
Thou
Kennard's blog to be of interest:
http://revk.www.me.uk/2011/11/ipv6-for-consumers-on-dsl-at-last.html
Pretty inexpensive, even here in rip-off Britain (~£32-35 inc. VAT @20%)
to the point where a 'niche' ISP like A&A[1] can actually give them away
for free with new lines.
Tom
[1] http://aa.net.uk
to just
peer where you need guaranteed connectivity. If change is a problem to
your customers, they don't understand how BGP works and they need to cut
out the middle-man.
Tom
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:06 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have
> predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP!
> Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this
> new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bi
veryone on this mailing list make it their #1 New
Years Resolution to fix this problem. If we all work together, we can
do something about it!
Tom
--
http://EverythingSysadmin.com -- my blog
http://www.TomOnTime.com -- my videos
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 07:24 -0500, Ray Soucy wrote:
> The speed of light is such a drag.
It could be worse... You could've been born on a larger planet.
don't use that
until 6.10, we're told.)
If I remember rightly a 3920 can't pop-off an S-tag on egress, too.
There's some silly limitation like that.
Tom
s null routed statically)
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/
A very handy service!
Tom
801 - 900 of 1187 matches
Mail list logo
