Hi Job, all,
> On 30 Oct 2020, at 11:06, Job Snijders wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:14:16PM +0100, Alex Band wrote:
>> In fact, we argue that it's actually a bad idea to do so:
>>
>> https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/why-routinator-doesnt-fall-back-to-rsync/
>>
>> We're interested to hear view
Hi Randy, all,
> On 31 Oct 2020, at 04:55, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> If there is a covering less specific ROA issued by a parent, this will
>> then result in RPKI invalid routes.
>
> i.e. the upstream kills the customer. not a wise business model.
I did not say it was. But this is the problemati
Hi Chris, list,
> On 10 Nov 2020, at 05:22, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> sure... it's just made one set of decisions. I was hoping with some
> discussion we'd get to:
> Welp, sure we can fallback and try rsync if we don't see success in
> time.
We will implement fallback in the next release
Hi,
Everyone is welcome to read that list of course, but the TL;DR is:
ARIN currently uses a pre RFC 8183 format for the identity exchange. It would
be good if this were updated. New versions of rpkid as well as Krill have
issues with the old format.
In the meantime this XSL provided by rpki.n
4 matches
Mail list logo