On 04/01/11 04:04, Ken Chase wrote:
> I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their own
> servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly
> experiencing low levels of spam.
Connection and rejection counts have been going bonkers of late for
On 13/09/11 01:12, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> as eliot pointed out, to defeat dane as currently written, you would
>>> have to compromise dnssec at the same time as you compromised the CA at
>>> the same time as you ran the mitm. i.e. it _adds_ dnssec assurance to
>>> CA trust.
>> Yes, I saw that. It a
On 14/09/11 13:44, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Jima wrote:
>> Huh? I'm a bit lost here, since I had two StartSSL certs issued yesterday
>> afternoon.
>
> orly? wierd, they made a press release ~last-june (I think?) stating
> they were stopping issuance indefini
On 09/03/12 09:40, Matthew Huff wrote:
> Just got an email today to our account associated with our legacy
> ARIN address space. A firm "Precision Management of Texas" is
> interested in subleasing some of our IP space for "on-demand
> solutions for brand marketers and website promotion chiefly thr
On 09/06/12 05:48, Michael Thomas wrote:
> Linkedin has a blog post that ends with this sage advice:
>
> * Make sure you update your password on LinkedIn (and any site that you
> visit on the Web) at least once every few months.
>
> I have accounts at probably 100's of sites. Am I to understand
On 24/11/14 13:41, Brian Henson wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
>
Over on [dns-operations]:
> On 24/11/14 13:38, Brad Volz wrote:>
>> The craigslist account at one of our r
On 13/03/15 10:20, Jason Iannone wrote:
> There was once a fairly common saying attributed to an early
> networking pioneer that went something like, "be generous in what you
> accept, and send only the stuff that should be sent." Does anyone
> know what I'm talking about or who said it?
>
Jon P
On 08/05/15 11:58, Mike Hammett via NANOG wrote:
> I've seen the same over here and also considered it weird.
It looks exactly like the the DMARC senders treatment - I think there's
something wiggy and everyone is being treated as a DMARC encumbered sender.
On 03/07/13 11:12, Scott Weeks wrote:
> "As of July 2, 2013, .nyc has been approved by ICANN as a
> city-level top-level domain (TLD) for New York City"
Do they have DNSSEC from inception? It would seem a sensible thing to do
for a virgin TLD.
On 10/10/13 03:30, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> Yet, apparently, Google has very recently completely stopped accepting
> email with no PTR records.
They also don't try very hard to get the PTR record. If the packet is
lost, has a routing issue, or a DDoS prevents reliable access to the
name ser
On 15/01/14 10:06, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> Off-list replies are fine to minimize noise, and if there is an answer
> or any meaningful correlation I will reply on-list. Thanks in advance
> for any info/feedback.
I have been running into these a lot also and have so far concluded that
it is an e
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 23:22 -0400, Eric Carroll wrote:
> On 10-04-21 06:59 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> > The url redirects to a Canadian med site.
> Just FYI, it's not a real Canadian med site. It is high probability
> not
> even Canadian.
Posting so many URLs which either are or should be liste
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 01:04 -0500, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> Spam-watch.com
>From the website:
About Spam-watch - This list is meant as a replacement for the SPAM-L
list which was abruptly shut down in May 2009.
On the contrary - Spam-l.com continues on different hosting with
different mo
Quinn Kuzmich wrote:
> lol WHAT
>
> I can honestly say of all the emails I could have imagined to get from
> NANOG, this was not one of them.
I'm trying to figure out why the FBI is trying to smuggle $8 million in
terrorist funds to me through diplomatic channels? Then again, it looks
like the FB
14 matches
Mail list logo