Don't try detereministic NAT, it's not worth it. You'll waste a lot of
port capacity on most users, and it might still be problematic for power
users.
Just try to match one user to one real IP, many sites/applications don't
like when there are several requests from one user with different IPs.
On 30.06.2014 14:12, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> I've seen huge problems from compromised machines completely killing
> NATs from the southbound side.
It depends on CGN solution used. Some of them will just block new
translations for that user after reaching the limit, and that's it.
On 30.06.2014 0
I want to reiterate on AirConsole because it IS amazing. I don't even
grab a laptop when I go onsite anymore, just an AirConsole, its
usb-serial cable and a tablet.
Laptop can be a requirement if you need more than a serial, but using
serial-over-wifi and a tablet is an incredible quality of life
Is there any particular reason you prefer EX4600 over QFX5100 ? Not
counting obvious differences like ports and upgrade options.
It's the same chipset after all, and with all upgrades they have the
same 10G density (with breakouts). Is that because you can have more 40G
ports with EX4600 ?
I'm st
flowspec.
Probably the best method if you have competent engineers and uplinks who
can give you bgp flowspec.
Makes bandwitdh attacks amusing instead of annoying.
Hello,
I'm sure lots of you work for big enterprises, and some of you work for
biggest of them.
How many of you architect your network as an ISP, with that enterprise
as the biggest customer ? Office networks in l3vpn, VPLS/EVPN on top of
your own network for DCI, etc ? Or is it usually just
13.06.2015 05:35, Randy Bush wrote:
i have seen a lot of this done with firewall devices and vlans. with
vlans or mpls, you can make spaghetti without wires, one wheat and one
semolina.
oh absolutely. you can use many tools to lop off your fingers, my
point was that things like mpls (or vlans)
18.06.2015 18:00, shawn wilson wrote:
I'd actually be interested in a discussion of how much you can possibly
> improve / degrade on a network that big from a management position.
That's quite an interesting topic, isn't it ?
Dilbert still has his job so it might as well be immutable. :-)
8 matches
Mail list logo
