ing summaries during data ingestion and only reloading the summaries.
>>>> (Overlooking the fact that for dashboards, refreshing every few seconds is
>>>> usually pointless because you end up looking at short-term statistical
>>>> spikes
>>>>
Hi All
Currently having a terrible situation in Nigeria where the GLO1 and
MainOne cables appear to be both down.
Can anyone suggest a good Nigerian ISP with redundancies enough to
overcome at least two of the following dying out?
SAT-3
WACS
GLO1
ACE
MainOne
Please dont say MTN or any of the Nig
PCCW? I dont think I've heard of them
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Rod Beck
wrote:
>
> PCCW has a strong presence in Africa and they are easy to work with.
>
>
> - R.
>
>
> From: NANOG on behalf of Sina Owolabi
>
> Sen
, 2017 at 9:01 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 18, 2017, at 12:29, Sina Owolabi wrote:
>
> PCCW? I dont think I've heard of them
>
>
> Pccw would be sat3 glo1 and wacs maybe others.
>
> http://mediafiles.pccwglobal.com/image
Hi!
I am in a bit of a planning and implementation quandary and I'm hoping
to solicit implementation assistance on an already existing network
which needs to have segmentation and security.
I have only remote access to the network which comprises a number of
Red Hat Linux 6-based hypervisor serv
May 22, 2015 at 7:51 PM Sina Owolabi
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> I am in a bit of a planning and implementation quandary and I'm hoping
>> to solicit implementation assistance on an already existing network
>> which needs to have segmentation and security.
Thanks Baldur. I am definitely planning on doing that.
Eric, no the VMs are not all segregated, they are all blended
together. You can find a 192.168 sharing the same physical host as a
10.10.
I've never played with OpenVSwitch before, though. Would introducing
it here lead to any further complexi
I'm curious. What reading and comprehension level does one need to be
considered a network heavy? No snark, I really would like to know.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, 6:01 AM Mark Foster wrote:
>
>
> On 11/06/2015 4:46 p.m., Alex White-Robinson wrote:
> > Matthew Petach wrote:
> >
> >> On a slightly di
Hi
We are profiling equipment and design for an expected high user density
network of multiple, close nit, residential/hostel units. Its going to be
8-10 buildings with possibly a over 1000 users at any given time.
We are looking at Ruckus and Ubiquiti as options to get over the high
number of dev
ly great experience with Aruba. Don't know if it fits
> your budged, though.
>
> Rebards,
>
> On 19 June 2015 at 08:24, Tyler Mills wrote:
> > With that many users I cannot recommend Ubiquiti, Ruckus would be the way
> > to go.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 19
> Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> > On Jun 19, 2015 9:13 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz"
> wrote:
> >
> >> >>>The thing you need to watch out for with Ubiquiti is that they don't
> >> support DFS, so the entire U-NII-2 channel space is off limits
ective.
>
> I've never run Xirrus personally, but I think they were used for the last
> NANOG conference.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Sina Owolabi
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everybody. I've been corrected on density... I've been inform
Hi!
I apologize if this is not something I should have posted here, but I've
come to value the insights and experience of the people on this list a lot,
and I am hoping my problem isn't unique. I am also sorry for the long read.
I have been to the forums of the devices in play in this problem, an
a White Paper on it:
> > >
> > > http://arubanetworks.com/wp-content/uploads/stadiumRFfund.pdf
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:51 AM, John Todd wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >&
Well now. Being scared is part of the insight :-)
And until I see a "No!!! Don't do it!!" post...
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:10 AM Randy Bush wrote:
> > This has all been a very huge help, and I am thankful for all the
> > insights and reading material. I feel expert already!
>
> then you should
No, I don't.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-Original Message-
From: "Dobbins, Roland"
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:20:51
To: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: Re: Is there a method or tool(s) to prove network outages?
On Dec 1, 2013, at 11:56 PM, Notify Me wrote:
> Is the
I'm actually halfway through trying to setup a smokeping appliance.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-Original Message-
From: joel jaeggli
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 09:38:39
To: Dobbins, Roland; nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: Re: Is there a method or tool(s) to prove networ
Thanks a lot, ill definitely consider it.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-Original Message-
From: Andrew D Kirch
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 13:40:44
To:
Subject: Re: Is there a method or tool(s) to prove network outages?
Sina,
I'd recommend using Zenoss to monitor the
Hmm. Great points. Didn't think of that.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-Original Message-
From: Matt Palmer
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:50:31
To:
Subject: Re: Is there a method or tool(s) to prove network outages?
On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 05:56:51PM +0100, Notify Me wr
Its cyclical, but I have not tried to graph/measure its repetition before now
(when I noticed the emails filling up my inbox).
Body of tidal water..could be, but I wasn't involved in the installation so I
can't actually tell where the antennas are pointing.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless devi
Thanks a lot for the in-depth insights, all. Ill be doing a lot of "sleuthing"
in the next few days based on all this information.
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN
-Original Message-
From: Warren Bailey
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 03:09:13
To: Dobbins, Roland; nanog@nanog.org
21 matches
Mail list logo