ment guidance to go along with that.
I have my own feelings, but let me ask this: what do you all feel about
installing a Teredo server in order to provide v6 connectivity to your clients?
Is this something that you are really interested in?
You feedback is welcome.
Sean Siler|IPv6 Program
544/UDP, the bubble packets are blocked, and Teredo ceases to
function, even for those clients who are already configured.
Sean Siler|IPv6 Program Manager
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Ward
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:
I'd really like to talk to the guy who presented this. Does anyone happen to
have a contact for him? Feel free to send it privately if you do.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Marco Hogewoning [mailto:mar...@marcoh.net]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 10:48 AM
To: na...@merit.edu
Subject: Re
1. I completely agree with Jeroen
2. Jack, if you have specific concerns that Jeroen hasn't answered, feel free
to ping me off line. I own Teredo in Windows.
Sean from "M$"
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@unfix.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:40 AM
To: Jack
Nope. XP does not support DHCPv6 - only Vista/Windows Server 2008 (and later)
can do that.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: TJ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
>-Original Message-
>From: C
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SLAAC(autoconfig) vs DHCPv6
Sean Siler wrote:
> Nope. XP does not support DHCPv6 - only Vista/Windows Server 2008 (and later)
> can do that.
>
> Sean
http://internecine.eu/systems/windows_xp-ipv6.html and
http://internecine.eu/software/dibbler_dhcpv6.html di
6 matches
Mail list logo
