Re: Reverse DNS RFCs and Recommendations

Hi, Op 2 nov. 2013, om 12:16 heeft Masataka Ohta het volgende geschreven: > Mark Andrews wrote: > >> A cable modem both accepts DHCP packets (for management of the >> modem) and passes DHCP packets through to the customer device. > > Even if the CPE does so, which means there is no NAT, the k

Re: Reverse DNS RFCs and Recommendations

Hi, > Also remember that this thread is on secure rDNS by the ISP, > which means you can't expect the ISP operate rDNS very securely > even though the ISP operate rest of networking not very securely. You're linking things together that are completely orthogonal... Sander

Re: What routers do folks use these days?

Hi Mikael, > Some go for the new Sup2T for the 6500, but I don't know how much more CPU it > has compared to your SUP/RSP720, perhaps someone else knows? The Sup2T I worked on has: CPU: MPC8572_E, Version: 2.2, (0x80E80022) CORE: E500, Version: 3.0, (0x80210030) CPU:1500MHz, CCB:600MHz, DDR:

Re: turning on comcast v6

Hi, Op 11 dec. 2013, om 20:46 heeft Kinkaid, Kyle het volgende geschreven: > I'm curious, do you know of a consumer-grade router which supports > DHCPv6-PD? I have tested a whole bunch of them more than a year ago. I can remember seeing IPv6 DHCPv6-PD client support on gear from AVM Fritz!box,

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi, > Yeah, its been a while since I had to get involved in this. We have a > customer with their own IPv4 allocation that wants us to announce a /27 for > them. Back in "the day", it was /24 or larger or all bets were off. Is > that still the case now? This is still the case today. I wonder w

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi, Op 25 jan. 2014, om 23:05 heeft Jeff Kell het volgende geschreven: > (snip) > > I doubt that anything > /24 will ever be eligible as a "portable" > provider independent block. If within a provider, you can slice and > dice as you wish. Sure, but the text I quoted is about ARIN allocation

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi Jimmy, > There aren't any /27 or /28 Allocations from ARIN to an ISP > A /28 is longer than the ARIN Minimum allocation block size of /22, and > longer than the minimum transfer size of a /24 block. Now: yes. Soon: no. Read https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four10 Sander

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi Owen, Op 26 jan. 2014, om 05:36 heeft Owen DeLong het volgende geschreven: > On Jan 25, 2014, at 13:59 , Sander Steffann wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> […] But, when that happens ARIN will only have the 'Dedicated IPv4 block to >>> facilitate IPv6

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi Owen, >> Same question… Will people adjust their filters, (even if only for that >> prefix)? All over the world? I think 'will adjust their filters for XYZ' is >> highly optimistic, but let's hope it will work, otherwise the ISPs in the >> ARIN region will have a problem. (Or maybe not: exis

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi, > On 26/01/2014, at 10:35 pm, Dave Bell wrote: >>> But more important: which /10 is set aside for this? It is not listed on >> https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html >> >> 100.64/10 >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc6598 > > Correct me if I am wrong but this is the space reserve

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi Randy, > i suspect that, as multi-homing continues to grow and ipv4 space > fragments to be used in core-facing nat[64]-like things, a decade from > now we'll see the boundary move to the right. Maybe, if the equipment can handle the number of routes. I actually see two opposing things: the s

<    1   2