Disney+ geolocation error for 213.134.224.0/19

Hi, Anybody around from Disney+? my main customer (Solcon) is an ISP in the Netherlands. One of our ranges is 213.134.224.0/19 and it seems to be classified as non-Netherlands. The official support channel doesn't get any further than "you must be using a VPN" even though we are the ISP and it

Re: Disney+ geolocation error for 213.134.224.0/19

Hi, > I had a similar issue here in Sweden. The contact point listed at > http://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ > (netad...@disneystreaming.com) helped me with this pretty quickly. Useful link, thanks! Sander

Re: 100G over 100 km of dark fiber

Hi, On 30-10-2020 15:33, Dale W. Carder wrote: You may also find that 100G PAM4 could work. There are some vendors that sell the optic, and an outboard EDFA + DCF pizza box. We are about to deploy these on a couple of dark fibers: https://www.solid-optics.com/product/edfamux-multiplexer-ampl

Re: NDAA passed: Internet and Online Streaming Services Emergency Alert Study

Hi, On Fri, 2021-01-01 at 17:07 -0500, Sean Donelan wrote: > The House on Monday and the Senate on Friday have overriden the > President's veto of the National Defense Authorization Act for > Fiscal Year 2021 passing it into law. > > Among the NDAA's various sections, it includes the Reliable >

Re: OVH datacenter SBG2 in Strasbourg on fire 🔥

> Again: all conjecture, which seems to be tolerated here. ;-) It's all good food for thoughts! It's important to learn from these things, because I (and I expect many others) assumed that fire suppression systems would prevent something like this from happening. It is good to think and talk about

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

Hi! On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 11:38 +0300, Saku Ytti wrote: > Juniper has worked like this since day1 and shockingly the world > doesn't care, people really don't care for accuracy. CLI and SNMP are > both L3. If you want to report L2 'set chassis fpc N pic N > account-layer2-overhead'. > > However,

Re: "Is BGP safe yet?" test

Hi, > Removing a resource from the certificate to achieve the goal you describe > will make the route announcement NotFound, which means it will be accepted. > Evil RIR would have to replace an existing ROA with one that explicitly makes > a route invalid, i.e. issue an AS0 ROA for specific mem

Re: Mikrotik RPKI Testing

> Mostly. > > I'm only living without IPv6 for the moment, which is painful... :) OMG!!! Max, I'm so sorry to hear that :'( signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: questions asked during network engineer interview

> I find there's a strong INVERSE correlation between the quantity of > certificates on an applicant's resume and their ability to do the > job. Never got a certificate, don't want one either :) Sander signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: strange scam? email claiming to be from the fbi

> Quite a bit of discussion on the outages mailing list. It was an exploited > HTML form on the FBI site. That's a flashback to the '90s :) Sander

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices

Hi, > No SRv6 is MPLS labeling where label is carried inside IP instead > before the IP header. Layering violation which increases complexity > and cost for no other purpose except dishonest marketing about 'it is > IP, you already understand it, MPLS is hard'. What worries me more is the opportu

Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices

Hi Randy, > this is quite true, and a serious issue. but it has a good side. if > you run an ipv6 enebled network, you can deploy srv6 without enabling > srv6 everywhere, only at the marking encaps or embed) points. nice for > partial and/or incremental deployment. Yep, that's what I like abou

Large prefix lists/sets on IOS-XR

Hi, What is the best/most efficient/most convenient way to push large prefix lists or sets to an XR router for BGP prefix filtering? Pushing thousands of lines through the CLI seems foolish, I tried using the load command but it seems horribly slow. What am I missing? :) Cheers! Sander --- fo

Re: Large prefix lists/sets on IOS-XR

Hi Ytti, >> Pushing thousands of lines via CLI/expect automation is def not a great >> idea, no. Putting everything into a file, copying that to the device, and >> loading from there is generally best regardless. The slowness you refer to >> is almost certainly just because of how XR handles co

Re: QFX5k question

Hi, > thanks for quick reply. I forgot to mention, 2 x 10G providers with full > routing table on each. Those QFXs won't be able to hold full routing tables: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/layer-2-forwarding-tables.html#id-configuring-the-unified-forwarding-ta

Re: JunOS Fusion Provider Edge

Hi Aaron, > Can I test fusion using vMX and vQFX ? Will it work? I have tried and haven't managed to get it working. It's one of the improvements that I would like to see in vMX and vQFX. #featurerequest Cheers, Sander signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

MX10003 rack size

Hi, Has anyone ever managed to fit a Juniper MX10003 in a 90cm deep rack? Without applying power tools to either the rack or the router ;) Cheers, Sander signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: MAP-E

Hi Lee, > Also but, would that be a Net Neutrality problem, charging less for a service > that has arguably worse access to Amazon, Reddit, Twitter, etc.? Net neutrality as it is here in Europe usually is satisfied when no preferential treatment is given to a limited set of services (Netflix ha

Re: MX10003 rack size

Hi, > here it does fit in 600x1000 racks (APC & Minkels), with everything plugged, > airfilter/frontpanel installed, doors closed. > Front door / front rails / rear rails / rear door: 15cm / 72cm / 12cm I can confirm those measurements. We have installed two MX10003 routers in 100cm racks. As l

Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

Hi, > Op 8 jun. 2016, om 23:39 heeft John Lightfoot het > volgende geschreven: > > How about: > > Dear Netflix network engineer who’s on the NANOG list. Could you please get > Netflix to fall back to ipv4 Just for geolocation please, the streaming works fine over IPv6 :) > if you block you

Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?

> So here we are now... Where do we want to go? I think IXPs have indeed become too much like ISPs, providing more services but also increasing complexity and cost. I prefer simple, scalable and cheap solutions! I want to go to an IXP being a nice simple ethernet switch. Add some nice graphs a

Re: Bonded VDSL2 / ADSL2+ Modems with 4 or more lines bonded

Hi, > Zyxel SBG3600-N may be another offering you might want to look into? I think those are limited to 2x VDSL + LTE. Cheers, Sander

Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment

Hi, > Suggest /128's for loopbacks and /124's for point to points, all from > the same /64. This way you don't burn space needlessly, don't open > yourself to neighbor discovery issues on point to points I usually reserve one /64 for loopbacks, reserve a /64 per point-to-point connection and con

Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment

Hi Bill, > Op 17 jan. 2017, om 22:55 heeft William Herrin het volgende > geschreven: > > I'm always interested in learning something new. Please explain the > DOS vectors you're referring to and how they're mitigated by > allocating a /64 to the point to point link. One thing that comes to min

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Hi, > Dne 17/05/2018 v 15:03 Niels Bakker napsal(a): >> * na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Thu 17 May 2018, 14:44 CEST]: >>> Agreed. This is garbage, un-needed legislation. >> >> Disagreed. These are great and necessary regulations.> >> I'm loving the flood of convoluted unsubscribe notices this

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Hi, >> Thanks for the clarification. But whether that fine will be less than 10M is >> extremely vague and (I guess?) left up to the opinions or whims of a Euro >> bureaucrat or judge panel, or something like that... based on very vague and >> subjective criteria. I've searched and nobody can s

Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

Hi, >> The way GDPR is written, if you want to collect (and store) so much as >> the IP address of the potential customer who visited your website, you >> need their informed consent and you can’t require that they consent as >> a condition of providing service. > > What we were told is that sinc

Re: Rising sea levels are going to mess with the internet

Hi, > The available data does not support your speculation. > >> https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.GHGT.KT.CE?locations=US-EU-CN Maybe it would be more fair to look at CO2 emissions per capita: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?locations=EU-US-CN Cheers, Sander

Re: Puerto Rico Internet Exchange

Hi, > In general an IX only makes sense when there are local resources to exchange. > It doesn’t seem like PR has a lot of, if any, content providers of its own, > so most consumer content is coming from offshore anyway. This can also work the other way: once there is a local IXP, it can open

Re: IP Dslams

Hi, > How many devices are you looking for? > Consider ZyXEL 1248: > https://www.zyxel.com/uk/en/products_services/48-port-Temperature-Hardened-ADSL2--Box-DSLAM-IES-1248-5x-IES-1248-5xA-Series/ I had bad experiences with those. When testing IPv6 they messed up the data inside the PPP session. T

Re: Google Fiber v6 PD only giving /64

Hi, > Anybody here from Google Fiber? When I first got it last year, my IPv6 > setup got a /56 prefix delegated. I now see that no matter what size I > request, I only get a /64. Is this intentional? Sounds broken, especially considering how people like Lorenzo have always fought for giving e

Re: IP Dslams

Hi, >> How many devices are you looking for? >> Consider ZyXEL 1248: >> https://www.zyxel.com/uk/en/products_services/48-port-Temperature-Hardened-ADSL2--Box-DSLAM-IES-1248-5x-IES-1248-5xA-Series/ > > I had bad experiences with those. My apologies, my problems were with a different Zyxel model

Re: Last Mile Design

Hi Mark, > My preference, for the home, would be Active-E. But I do understand the > economics that may support PON, and my position on that has softened over the > years. Same for me. I like the architecture where the PON splitters are in powered roadside cabinets (even though the splitter is

Re: A Deep Dive on the Recent Widespread DNS Hijacking

Hi Paul, > Reread this and felt I should clarify that I realize that John and Doug > are not the ones saying DNSSEC is useless. I just hate to see the knee > jerk "oh, see, DNSSEC didn't save the day so it's obviously > useless". Let's give the world a better explanation. Security is only as stro

Re: A Deep Dive on the Recent Widespread DNS Hijacking

> Op 26 feb. 2019, om 10:56 heeft Bill Woodcock het volgende > geschreven: > > We need to get switched over to DANE as quickly as possible, and stop wasting > effort trying to keep the CA system alive with ever-hackier band-aids. +1 Sander signature.asc Description: Message signed with Open

Re: Cellular enabled console server

Hi, > NANOG - Are any of you running a console server to access your network > equipment via a serial connection at a remote site? If so, what are you > using and how much do you like it? I have a project where I need to stand > up over 100 remote sites and would like a backdoor to the console j

Re: Cogent BCP-38

Hi, > Op 29 aug. 2017, om 15:29 heeft Rob Evans het > volgende geschreven: > >> Well, if you are using public IP addresses for infra you are violating your >> RIR’s policy more than likely. > > [Citation needed.] :) I am pretty confident that I know those policies well enough to say that you

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

> But more important: which /10 is set aside for this? It is not listed on https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html >>> >>> I'm not sure it has been determined yet, let alone announced. >> >> According to https://www.arin.net/resources/request/ipv4_countdown.html >> phase one it

Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?

Hi, > Op 27 jan. 2014 om 10:49 heeft Tore Anderson het volgende > geschreven: > > * Sander Steffann > >> But more important: which /10 is set aside for this? It is not listed >> on https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html > > Probably 23.128/10: &

Re: ipv6 newbie question

Hi, > Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or > for that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically > configured address or use EUI-64 auto config? > > I have seen comments on both sides and am leaning to EUI-64 (except for the > VIP's li

Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators (was: RE: [arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal)

Hi Owen, > I, for one, would not want to start having to pay RIPE-level fees. > > ARIN fees are a much better deal than RIPE fees. Only up to Small... The RIPE NCC membership fee is €1750 (±$2400 currently) for everybody. The ARIN fees are between $500 and $32000, with category Small at $2000

Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators (was: RE: [arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal)

Hi Owen, > Compare and contrast the costs of being a PI holding end-user in the RIPE > region to those in the ARIN region and the difference becomes much more > noticeable. Yeah, RIPE NCC is definitely much cheaper for PI: no initial registration fee of ≥$500. The maintenance cost is $100/year

Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators

Oops. /me was confused. €50 indeed! Met vriendelijke groet, Sander Steffann > Op 28 mrt. 2014 om 15:20 heeft Nick Hilliard het volgende > geschreven: > >> On 28/03/2014 14:03, Sander Steffann wrote: >> Yeah, RIPE NCC is definitely much cheaper for PI: no initial >>

Re: Requirements for IPv6 Firewalls

Hi Bill, > Also, I note your draft is entitled "Requirements for IPv6 Enterprise > Firewalls." Frankly, no "enterprise" firewall will be taken seriously > without address-overloaded NAT. I realize that's a controversial > statement in the IPv6 world but until you get past it you're basically > was

Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?

Hi, > Ok, so I'll give you that tunneling a really short bit, tunneling isn't too > bad, but native is most of the time better. So sad that some companies mess up in such a way that their customers rather tunnel than use their native infra... :-( - Sander

Re: Advisory — D-root is changing its IPv4 address on the 3rd of January.

Hi, > Additionally, we will be actively monitoring usage after the 6 month > period to determine when best to terminate the service on the old IP. Good to hear that. > The old address, which is in the middle of UMD's network, is going to be > black-holed once the change is over. Nothing will be

Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs

Hi, >> is likely to be following the >> reporting procedure for the provision of untruthful information to the >> RIPE NCC at http://www.ripe.net/contact/reporting-procedure, which is >> a well defined procedure. RIPE NCC will investigate any report >> submitted though this procedure; there is a

Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs

Hi, > I'm having more than a little deja vu here - Romanian LIRs have come up on > this list (leave alone nanog, or various other RIPE lists) more than once in > this context. In fact Yes, but like I said: talk on lists is not enough > There is an apparent pattern of large scale misuse of re

Re: Slashdot: UK ISP PlusNet Testing Carrier-Grade NAT Instead of IPv6

Hi, > If I have calculated the netmasks right that would mean to set aside: > > 2001:0DB8:6440::/42 > > for the use of 6rd service: > > 2001:0DB8:6440:::/64 = 100.64.0.0 > > 2001:0DB8:647F:::/64 = 100.127.255.255 You probably should add a few extra bits for subnetting behind the 6

Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question

Hi, > There are several conflicting requirements, including: > > - requirement to run a business which makes money > - constraints on IPv4 addresses which mandate NAT > - law enforcement requirements, mandating either logging / port tracking > - network telemetry > > law enforcement requirements

Re: IPV6 in enterprise best practices/white papaers

Hi, > I have read many of those ipv6 documents and they are great but I > still luck to find something like "real word" scenario. Keep an eye on Deploy360: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ipv6/ > What I mean is that for example I want to start implementation of ipv6 > in my enterprise a

Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification

Hi, > First of all, multihomed sites with its own global routing > table entries bloats the global routing table, which is the > major cause of global routing table bloat and is not acceptable. Sorry, but that is false. Looking at the CIDR report (http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#Gains) the rou

Re: routing table go boom

ication > system. > > Granted that it is no worse than multihoming by routing protocols. > > But, it merely means that neither BGP nor LISP works "completely > and correctly". Well, yeah, if your internal routing (behind the ETR) breaks then your network is broken... Met vriendelijke groet, Sander Steffann

VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T

ally been tested... So: has anybody ever set up a network like this, or am I really beta testing for Cisco now? Cheers, Sander Steffann

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T

Hi, > We're trying to implement VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T (VSS) > as described in > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11-663645.html#wp9000139 > and constantly failing. It seems so simple: set up a VSS, use LACP or PAgP > port-chan

Re: Choice of address for IPv6 default gateway

Hi, > The issue of using FE80::1 everywhere (as the virtual IP in your FHRP > of choice) is operationally a wash, in terms of perceived complexity > from the front lines. Do people give me quizzical expressions the > first time they learn/use it? Absolutely. But a small amount of > "getting com

Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Hi, > What should happen is this "quasi-legitimate" method of > multi-homing should just be declared illegitimate for IPv6, to > facilitate stricter filtering. Instead, what should happen is the > multi-homing should be required to fit into one of 3 scenarios, so > any announcement with an IPv

Re: [IPv6] Monitoring BGP IPv6 Sesions

> On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote: >> Anyone can help us on that matter? > > We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years. > > I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6 > sessions are down or broken. +1 Sander

Re: Juniper advertises ::/0 Cisco hears ::/3

Hi, > This one is very strange... > > Has anyone seen this behavior with BGP IPv6 between Juniper (owned by Level > 3, advertising routes correctly, sending default ::/0) and Cisco (6509 > running 12.2.58.SXI6 advipservices, receiving all routes fine except > default, hearing ::/3)? I worked wit

Re: Cisco 7200 PCI Limitations

Hi, > The other option left is the I/O controller. I found that you can get a port > adaptor jacket card [2] for the 7200's that let you stick a normal interface > card into the I/O controller slot (instead of the I/O controller itself). > > My main concern is if the jacket card uses its own PC

Re: Dropping IPv6 Fragments

Hi, >> Who drops IPv6 fragments in their network, under what circumstances? > > No one who offers working IP connections. > > Dropping IPv6 fragments against your control-plane, that is another > discussion, but dropping them in transit would be short-lived exercise. Depends on where you are lo

Re: best way to create entropy?

Hi, When you let OpenSSH use the egd protocol directly it will get its entropy from an egd daemon. Otherwise it uses /dev/random. When you use ekeyd-egd-linux then you feed the entropy from the egd daemon to the pool used for /dev/random. That way you are not completely dependent on the egd dae

Re: Issues encountered with assigning all ones IPv6 /64 address? (Was Re: Issues encountered with assigning .0 and .255 as usable addresses?)

Hi, > RFC 2526 reserves the last 128 host addresses in each subnet for anycast use. But that would mean that the ...:fffe address also shouldn't work. Considering RFC 2526 then filtering those addresses when used as source address makes sense. - Sander PS: I'm in contact with a network enginee

Re: Issues encountered with assigning all ones IPv6 /64 address?

Hi, > On a separate note, one of my customers discovered over the weekend > that if they bring up an all ones IPv6 address in their /64 > (2001:db8:1:1::::) then they can't exchange traffic > with stuff hosted at hetzner.de such as archives.postgresql.org or > 1-media-cdn.foolz.us.

Re: IP tunnel MTU

Hi, >>> Certainly fixing all the buggy host stacks, firewall and compliance devices >>> to realize that ICMP isn't bad won't be hard. >> >> Wait till you get started on "fixing" the "security" consultants. > > Ack. I've yet to come across a *device* that doesn't deal properly with > "packet t

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

Hi Owen, > You really shouldn't need to parse these and it's perfectly valid to reject > them as invalid input. This really is an output only format [...] I don't agree. I think it's actually the other way around. It's a valid representation of an IPv6 address so you be able to parse them. You

Re: Long and unabbreviatable IPv6 addresses with random overloaded bits, vs. tunnelbroker

Hi, > I've tried contacting them in an effort to receive any kind of a > "proper" IPv6 address without the plaintext IPv4 embedment, but > they've given me all sorts of crazy and (IMHO) far-sketched excuses; > from not wanting to maintain a separate database of IPv6 > addresses/subnets, and from l

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

Hi, > So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the "native" percentage? As the traffic is delivered as native traffic to Google I don't think Google can even see that there is a tunnel between them and the user. They might see a lower MTU, but to Google the traffic is native IPv6.

Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

Hi, >>> Again, where're the compelling IPv6-only content/apps/services? >>> >> >> To answer your rhetorical question, http://www.kame.net/ has a dancing >> kame. To my knowledge, that's the most compelling IPv6-only content. > > Don't forget http://loopsofzen.co.uk/ - that's definitely the mos

Re: fire ants

Hi Suresh, Op 13 aug. 2014, om 03:16 heeft Suresh Ramasubramanian het volgende geschreven: > Needs an "Anthill Inside" sticker like Hex at the Unseen University. I should have bought one at the Discworld Convention last weekend :) http://www.pjsmprints.com/stickers/index.html Cheers, Sander

Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?

Hi Aaron, > Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was > surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do: > >> Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional >> cost of $XXX/month. Please let me know if you would like to go ahead with >> the

Re: The Next Big Thing: Named-Data Networking

Hi, > How many Youtube subject tags will fit in *your* routers' TCAM? > > > http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/09/04/2156232/ucla-cisco-more-launch-consortium-to-replace-tcpip > > [ Can someone convince me this isn't the biggest troll in the history > of the internet? Cause it sounds like shoe

Re: Here comes iOS 8...

Hi, > Do you have a reference? Someone just told me it is more around 5GB. It seems to depend on the device. IIRC my iPhone 4S downloaded ±0.9GB and my iPad Mini ±1.3GB. That might be because the 4S is still a 32-bit device. Cheers, Sander

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation for Loopback Address

Hi, > Op 11 okt. 2014, om 23:00 heeft Roland Dobbins het > volgende geschreven: > >> On Oct 11, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Tim Raphael wrote: >> >>> From my research, various authorities have recommended that a single /64 be >>> allocated to router loopbacks with /128s assigned on interfaces. >> >>

Re: Industry standard bandwidth guarantee?

Hi, > and this industry would > perhaps be better off if we called a link that can deliver at best 17 > Megabits of Goodput reliably a "15 Megabit goodput +5 service" > instead of calling it a "20 Megabit service" But you don't know what the user is going to do over the link. If the average pac

Re: TeliaSonera IC Contacts

Hi, > Does anyone have a contact for an account manager at TeliaSonera IC? We’ve > sent at least 3 requests for a quote through their website over a month or so > and haven’t got a single reply except for the automated “we’ve received your > query” email. And you still want to buy from them?!?

Re: Transparent hijacking of SMTP submission...

Op 29 nov. 2014, om 19:37 heeft Randy Bush het volgende geschreven: > i think of it as an intentional traffic hijack. i would be talking to a > lawyer. > > randy, who plans to test next time he is behind comcast I am so glad that our Dutch net neutrality laws state that "providers of Internet

Re: TeliaSonera IC Contacts

Hi, > It's more of a "have to buy from them" as opposed to a "want to buy from > them." I'd much prefer NTT, but they are nowhere near where we are > unfortunately. You were talking about Amsterdam, right? There are plenty of transits you can buy from. Cheers, Sander

Re: v6 deagg

Hi Mans, > I'm working at one of those organisations who have a /48 and am announcing > it into DFZ. We have a situation where I might have another site with > separate connectivity to the DFZ (but there is internal networking) > which would entitle me to another /48 according to RIR rules. Corre

Re: internet visualization

> one of my colleagues just posted this visualiation > of the internet from the as_path view of 2914. if you are on > a mobile, you have to physically move your device around. > > http://as2914.net/ > > If you love it, send Job your accolades. If you hate it, > see above discl

Re: cisco.com unavailable

> Is cisco.com unavailable or it is affected just for > Rostelecom? Works fine here in The Netherlands (ISP: Solcon). Cheers, Sander

Re: /27 the new /24

Hi, > Op 4 okt. 2015, om 16:52 heeft Mel Beckman het volgende > geschreven: > > If it doesn't support IPSec, it's not really IPv6. Just as if it failed to > support any other mandatory IPv6 specification, such as RA. I think you're still looking at an old version of the IPv6 Node Requirement

Re: Android and DHCPv6 again

Hi, > SLAAC by default provides the address and default gateway (RA) > If SLAAC managed flag is set, then DHCPv6 is used get the address and other > configs (DNS, etc..) > If SLAAC other flag is set, then SLAAC provides the address, and uses DHCPv6 > to get the other configs (DNS, etc..) It's

Re: IPv6 Irony.

> I bet most money is spent on hiring software developers to change/review all > BSS/NSS systems to adopt to IPv6 ;) You should hire a consultant who can then push the software developers to hire people to change/review [..etc..] ;-) Cheers, Sander

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

Hi Owen, > To me, net neutrality isn’t as much about what you charge the customer for > the data, it’s about > whether you prioritize certain classes of traffic to the detriment of others > in terms of > service delivery. > > If T-Mobile were taking money from the video streaming services or on

Re: Nat

Hi Matthew, > The mix of having to do this crazy thing of gateway announcements > from one place, DNS from somewhere else, possibly auto-assigning > addresses from a router, but maybe getting them over DHCPv6. It's > just confusing and unnecessary and IMHO isn't helpful for > persuading people to

Re: Nat

Hi Jeff, > It's far past time to worry about architectural purity. We need people > deploying IPv6 *NOW*, and it needs to be the job of the IETF, at this > point, to fix the problems that are causing people not to deploy. I partially agree with you. If people have learned how IPv6 works, deploye

Re: Nat

Hi Nick, > Unfortunately, this turned into a religious war a long time ago and the > primary consideration with regard to dhcpv6 has not been what's best for > ipv6 or ipv6 users or ipv6 operators, but ensuring that dhcpv6 is > sufficiently crippled as a protocol that it cannot be deployed without

Re: Nat

Hi Matthew, > I have multiple sets of clients on a particular subnet; the subnet > is somewhat geographically distributed; I have multiple routers > on the subnet. I currently am able to explicitly associate clients > with the most appropriate router for them in v4. > How can I do this using only

Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration

Hi, > We just need Google to announce that IPv6 enabled sites will get a slight > bonus in search rankings. And just like that, there will suddenly be a > business reason to implement IPv6. I already discussed that with them a long time ago, but they weren't convinced. Maybe now is the time to d

Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration

Hi Vint, > Op 11 jan. 2016, om 12:47 heeft Vint Cerf het volgende > geschreven: > > since google is a major implementor of IPv6, some people might claim this is > an attempt to artificially inflate scores for Google sites. Sigh. Sigh indeed. On the other hand: IPv6 is getting enough traction

Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration

> Op 11 jan. 2016, om 15:05 heeft Vint Cerf het volgende > geschreven: > > sounds like the Federal Reserve testing the waters with hints of increasing > discount rate... :) signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: small automatic transfer switches

Hi, > There's also WTI, which we use: > http://www.wti.com/c-41-automatic-transfer-switch.aspx And for the small deployments their RSM series is great as well: automatic transfer switch, remote power switching and remote serial console all in one box. Those boxes are more expensive, but if you

Re: v6 deagg

Hi Bill, > I don't fully understand the math yet but the algorithm doesn't smell > right. As near as I can figure it may only be correct in a static > system. If after convergence the disaggregate ceases to be reachable > from the aggregate, there doesn't appear to be either enough > information i

Looking for Sky UK contact

Hi, If there is anybody from Sky UK here please contact me off-list. Cheers! Sander

Re: gmail security is a joke

> Op 29 mei 2015, om 08:42 heeft Joe Abley het volgende > geschreven: > > [...] > and around this point, I start to think > > - I've had enough of this > - this is too hard > - I don't even remember what I am signing up for at this point > - I am going to look for amusing cats on youtube Good

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

Hi Lorenzo, > It's certainly possible to make Android request N IPv6 addresses via > DHCPv6, and not accept the offer if it is offered fewer than N addresses. > But that only really makes sense if there's a generally-agreed upon minimum > value of N. I'd be happy to work with people on an Internet

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

> > It's not the *only* option. There are large networks - O(100k) IPv6 nodes - > that do ND monitoring for accountability, and it does work for them. Many > devices support this via syslog, even. As you can imagine, my Android device > gets IPv6 at work, even though it doesn't support DHCPv6.

Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

Hi, > I was hoping to find a solution that maybe utilized some kind of session sync > or something of that matter [...] And the session sync is then the weakest link. I have seen a cluster of Nexus switches crash in sync when saving the configuration (which was synced). True redundancy is only

Re: IPAM

Hi, > I'm pretty sure that if 6connect doesn't have an existing tool to import > Northstar that they'd work with your client to get it done. +1 on 6connect. Very helpful people there :-) Sander

  1   2   >