Re: Cisco 7606 RSP720 - no SVI bit/packets counters

Dean, Probably good to move this over to cisco-...@puck.nether.net and answer the questions below over there. What code is it? Looks like a bug where the IDB counters are not being bumped on the SVI. Is it L3 switching traffic through the SVI or L2 (intra vlan traffic between L2 ports)? R

Re: Cisco ASR

Sherwin, Let's move this specific crash/code question over to cisco-...@puck.nether.net. Try the 12.2(33)XNF1 release. If you would like to try and find the matching bug for what you are seeing before you upgrade email me offline with the crashinfo file and the full logs and I'll get someon

Re: PPP multilink help

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:37:25AM -0400, Andrey Gordon wrote: > Hey folks, I'm sure to you it's peanuts, but I'm a bit puzzled (most likely > because of the lack of knowledge, I bet). > > I'm buying an IP backbone from VNZ (presumably MPLS). I get a MLPPP hand off > on all sites, so I don't do th

Re: PPP multilink help

It could very well be microburst in the flow creating congestion as seen in the default class: > Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 252140 > 30 second output rate 1795000 bits/sec, 243 packets/sec > > Class-map: class-default (match-any) > 27511

Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

Ivan, It is confusing but from what I have tested you have it correct. The confusing part comes from multiple issues. a) The documentation about the default maxas limit being 75 appears to be incorrect. I'll get that fixed. b) Prior to CSCee30718 there was a hard limit of 255. After that fix

Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

at 05:31:49PM -0500, German Martinez wrote: > On Tue Feb 17, 2009, Rodney Dunn wrote: > > Hello Rodney, > It will be great if you can share with us your findings. It seems > like we are hitting different bugs in different platforms. > > Thanks > German > > > Ivan,

Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

er than 255 per Section 5.1.2 of RFC4271 Thanks to those that worked offline with us to verify the field results reported. Rodney On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 05:27:01PM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: > If you want to take this offline send it unicast or we could > move it to cisco-nsp. > > Wh

Re: anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

to John Stuppi for pointing it out. Rodney On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:15:02PM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote: > We are working on a document for Cisco.com but in the interim > here is the bug that will fix the issue of a Cisco IOS device > sending an incorrectly formatted BGP update when as