On 2021-08-02 10:57, Lars Prehn wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason why the status of 2002::/16 in IANA's IPv6 unicast
assignments list [1] is ALLOCATED (with '6to4' as designation and the
note field indicating reservation) rather than RESERVED?
Best regards,
Lars
Perhaps something to do with it be
On 2021-08-09 22:39, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
man. 9. aug. 2021 22.13 skrev Grzegorz Janoszka
:
On 2021-08-09 17:47, Billy Croan wrote:
How does the community feel about using /24 originations in BGP as
a
tactical advantage against potential bgp hijackers?
RPKI is more effective than a compe
On 2023-01-25 00:10, Chris J. Ruschmann wrote:
How do you plan on getting rid of all the filters that don’t accept
anything less than a /24?
In all seriousness If I have these, I’d imagine everyone else does
too.
Allow someone to advertise a covering /24 (and route onward to the
longer prefix
Another provider offering discounted IPv6 only VPSes is gandi.net
https://www.gandi.net/en/cloud -- the two cheapest options "XS-V6" and
"Small - IPv6" are IPv6 only.
also https://www.mythic-beasts.com/order/rpi is IPv6 only.
Rob
On 2019-05-05 23:26, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
I've found a VPS
On 2019-07-30 10:59, Chris Knipe wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:45 AM Scott Christopher
wrote:
Dan Hollis wrote:
RCPT To:
<<< 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
DATA
<<< 503 #5.5.1 RCPT first
Try j...@amazon.com
--
S.C.
Then update your ARIN records to reflect
On 2019-10-21 16:30, Keith Medcalf wrote:
On 21/10/19 6:30 pm, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Yes, and I really like Julien's proposal. It even looks pretty
complete. There are just a few details missing around how to make
the
MD5 => TLS transition smooth.
At least for those systems that run on Linu
On 2019-11-04 13:33, Chris Knipe wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:13 PM Jason Biel wrote:
22/8 is actively used by DoD, just not publicly. It would be in your
best interest to not accept routes for it.
if you need something more official, contact the DoD NIC directly at
the email address speci
I'm just assuming this because it doesn't say anywhere,
but given the context it seems likely to me that almost
none of the 90 domains were actually registered.
It sounds more likely that they figured out how the domain generation
algorithm works and instructed the registries to block out all
On 2017-02-10 04:18, Ken Chase wrote:
https://torrentfreak.com/internet-backbone-provider-cogent-blocks-pirate-bay-and-other-pirate-sites-170209/
/kc
Strange indeed.. but they forgot to ban it on IPv6 - maybe they're
trying to push IPv6 adoption!
Banning any Cloudflare hosted sites by IP is
On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:16:43 -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 1/29/14, 14:01, Leslie Nobile wrote:
Additionally, ARIN has placed 23.128.0.0/10 in its reserves in
accordance with the policy "Dedicated IPv4 block to facilitate IPv6
Deployment" (NRPM 4.10). There have been no allocations made from
You mean like this? ;)
1. ???
2. ldn-ipv6-b1.ipv6.telia.net
0.0% 31.0 1.2 1.0 1.4 0.2
3. cogent-ic-125507-ldn-b5.c.telia.net
0.0% 2 40.6 40.4 40.2 40.6 0.3
4. :::154.54.57.102
On 2015-06-12 16:58, Ray Soucy wrote:
Wouldn't the simple play here be for Android to just throw up a
message
saying "This network does not support tethering" if SLAAC isn't
enabled,
and to let users complain to local operators if that's something they
want? Google doesn't get blamed, operator
On 2024-07-06 21:11, John Von Essen wrote:
Ok…. now a rabbit hole. I looked at some vanity TLDs, and it appears
the ALOT of big companies have their names as TLDs, but almost none of
them are using it for anything. Why is that? Is it just a copyright
play to protect the name from some else taking
Possibly one use of a blockchain RPKI would be to restrict the RIR's
ability to sign RPKIs to address ranges under their management. The
blockchain would then be used for inter-RIR transfers, preventing RIRs
from going rogue and interfering with each other's RPKIs (such as a
court using it's po
14 matches
Mail list logo
