John R Levine wrote:
I don't have PI space, but I do have a competent ISP so I've never had any
mail problems due to adjacent addresses.
Having a competent ISP isn't a guarantee of exemption...only a
contributor. As evidenced by the discussion, some people choose the
scope of their wrath a
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
My view is that deploying only IPv6 in the LANs is the wrong approach in the
short term, unless you're sure that all your applications are ready, or you
have translation tools (that often are ugly), and you're disconnected from
the rest of the IPv4 Internet.
You're
Dave Larter wrote:
Seems like if the c14 was connected to a 240v PDU the 5-15 would
deliver 240v to the equipment, arc/pop tripping the breaker on the
PDU as soon as it is connected killing power to everything on that
PDU. Or am I missing something?
If you plug a PDU into a service that's high
Ricardo Oliveira wrote:
Jack,
Please give me your ASN and i'll double check our data. As long as the
network has 4 or less downstreams, it's being labeled as "stub".
More details here:
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~rveloso/papers/completeness-ton.pdf
I guess the old adage, "In theory, theory and p
Lixia Zhang wrote:
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Pete Templin wrote:
In (your) theory, your paper may hold up. In practice, your
definition of stub network is most likely considered wrong, and that
likely shifts a lot of the assumptions in your paper.
But I also believe that there are a
Sam Oduor wrote:
http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/final_update_ciscocom_outage/
I don't think the Kool-Aid powder is blending with the water...that's
from (almost) two years ago.
pt
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Do you really call this "little if any information publically visible"?
Nope, I was wrong about that. My search-fu on RIPE isn't up to snuff,
apparently; hence the request for assistance.
pt
One of my customers, a host at 64.8.105.15, is feeling a "bonus"
~130kpps from 88.191.63.28. I've null-routed the source, though our
Engine2 GE cards don't seem to be doing a proper job of that,
unfortunately. The attack is a solid 300% more pps than our aggregate
traffic levels.
It's comin
NANOG,
Here's my compilation of photos from NANOG45 and the Dominican Republic.
Most are taken by my girlfriend and I; some taken by others enjoying a
chance to experiment. :) Feel free to share with anyone you wish,
download, etc..
http://photos.templin.org/gallery/nanog45
Disclaimer: I
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:20:08 am p...@mindfury.net
wrote:
My question is, which is the correct method of
implementing this? Should we be redistributing static
and connected routes on our borders into IGP, and not
using next-hop-self? Or should we not redistribute and
us
John van Oppen (list account) wrote:
> I know I have experienced the engineering department there as well, the
> best one was when they wanted paper documentation for every route I
> asked to have in our filters... (and they were incapable of using
> RADB). It was especially odd since we have >
Tony Varriale wrote:
Thanks for the info. We needed larger than /22 anyways.
I am a bit surprised that they will hand out a small allocaiton for
multihomers. These days it's very easy to do. And, could be a easy way
to horde some v4.
Nope, you can horde a /24 for a single device, but it's
Joe Greco wrote:
They make a crimper specifically for it, which cuts of the ends. I
haven't done a few thousand ends with it but it does make it slightly
easier to maintain the twist further into the the plug because you can
pull it until snug.
Yeah, I am reluctant to go retooling for that cr
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Filter your bogons. But do it in an automated fashion, from a trusted
source.
Of course, I recommend Team Cymru, which has a most sterling record.
Nearly perfect (other than the fact they still recommend MD5 on BGP
sessions :).
How can you recommend Team Cymru,
Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Since there are ways to dynamically filter the bogons, using BGP or DNS,
I don't really see the need to stop doing so. If you're managing your
routing and firewall filters manually, you have bigger problems than the
release of Bogon space.
Can you share the Cisco configu
Jared Mauch wrote:
On a router with full routes (ie: no default) the command
is:
Router(config-if)#ip verify unicast source reachable-via any
None of these suggestions (including the wisecrack "ACLs") provide full
filtering:
If a miscreant originates a route in bogon space, their
16 matches
Mail list logo
