> Wes Felter
> IBM Research - Austin
IRON looks interesting. I will look at that in more depth. We provide true
multi-homing across providers (usually what we find most people mean when they
say BGP) and v6 to the home via LISP. The traffic can be configured for load
sharing across li
-Original Message-
From: Blake Dunlap [mailto:iki...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:00 PM
To: n...@flhsi.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
> I hear you guys, It's done that way for a bit of
You need to raise your MTU above that on the other side and do a ping size
sweep. Unlike at Layer-3 when you can use set a DF bit and get back an ICMP
error, at Layer-2 when you exceed the far side's MTU, the packets are silently
dropped.
Paul Vinciguerra
CCIE# 10291
120 W Park A
ASR supports OTV if you can do multicast over L3. Although, you may not need
L2 extensions in the end.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Lavine [mailto:source_ro...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:23 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Layer2 over Layer3
To all,
I am trying to
switch that has both the pseudowire trunk on it and the dedicated link
know how to forward the frames if either goes away?
From: David Swafford mailto:da...@davidswafford.com>>
To: Paul Vinciguerra
mailto:pvi...@vinciconsulting.com>>
Cc: Philip Lavine mailto:source_ro...@yahoo.com>
>
> Ok, then let's take a step back, perhaps not permanently, and say DNS
> resolution is only really useful for routers with more than just a
> single default external route.
>
> So DNS could be reduced to an inter-router only protocol, similar to
> BGP in some sense.
LISP DDT uses a lookup
6 matches
Mail list logo
