Hi,
The link is not the only component to fail - routers and routing protocols all
contribute at least as much.
If your customers would have redundant connections,
you also would like to look at convergence times.
So a measurement end to end by a probe in the customers network could give
you a mo
On 21.04.2020 20:59, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 4/21/20 2:35 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Interesting. So basically as Mel said, over-sold network. :-(
This is pretty typical of consumer VSAT and such. You can of course get better performance...if
you're willing to pay for it. If you find the
ends on the involved links to see if
upgrade is necessary -
421 ms might be too much ig it happens often.
Best regards
Olav Kvittem
>
> Thanks,
> Hank
>
>
> Caveat: The views expressed above are solely my own and do not express
> the views or opinions of my employe
Hi Mark,
Just comments on your points below.
On 13.08.2020 12:31, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> On 13/Aug/20 12:23, Olav Kvittem via NANOG wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better to measure the basic performance like packet
>> drop rates and queue sizes ?
>>
>> The
4 matches
Mail list logo
