Re: Providers that carry IPv6

2007-06-04 Thread Nicolás Antoniello
In fact, we have two tunnels, one with MCI and one with SPRINT. They're in "beta" state now, but we are getting 682 prefixes from MCI and 703 from SPRINT. Regards, Nicolas. On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: jordi. > jordi. >If I'm not wrong, you could get some service from MCI an

Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6

2007-06-29 Thread Nicolás Antoniello
steve. >multihoming is simple, you get an address block and route it to your upstreams Hey, that's a very "simplistic" IGP point of view !! I'm afraid I disagree :) On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Stephen Wilcox wrote: steve. > steve. >multihoming is simple, you get an address block and route it to y

Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6)

2007-06-29 Thread Nicolás Antoniello
Hi Stephen, Supose you have STM4 links, ok? And you have 2G of trafic from your 10 ADSL customers, ok? And those STM4 go to 3 dif carriers in USA. Then, how you advertise only one IPv6 prefix to all and make the 2G go trough one STM4 ? On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Stephen Wilcox wrote: steve. > s

Re: v6 multihoming (Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6)

2007-06-29 Thread Nicolás Antoniello
ffic than any steve. >single GE link. steve. > steve. >Steve steve. > steve. >On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:11:58PM -0300, Nicolás Antoniello wrote: steve. >> Hi Stephen, steve. >> steve. >> Supose you have STM4 links, ok? steve. >> And you have 2G of traf