I can only see about 450 right now - perhaps they fixed it
On 16/06/11 04:05, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:51:52 EDT, Chris Griffin said:
>> Prefixes Change ASnum AS Description
>> 19227 115->19342 AS15557 LDCOMNET NEUF CEGETE
There are a number of open resolvers that are that way by design (i.e.
Google), but most of them are there by misconfiguration, having a small
number (say < 100) of well-known open resolvers in the world is not a
problem, having > 1 million probably is
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Harry H
s database: Tue, 01 May 2012 12:29:12 UTC <<<
Mike Simkins ▪ Senior Network Engineer , Operations Engineering ▪ SunGard
Availability Services ▪ 25 Canada Square, London E14 5LQ
-Original Message-
From: TR Shaw [mailto:ts...@oitc.com]
Sent: 01 May 2012 13:23
To: Tony Tauber
Cc: NANO
That's the sort of thing we have in Europe, downstream customer need to be
in your AS-SET for filtering purposes
- Original Message -
From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jle...@lewis.org]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 11:29 AM
To: Robert E. Seastrom
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IRR-clueful per
RIPE 552 (I think), allows you to request up to a /29 without additional
justification if needed.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Bool [mailto:a...@logic.org.uk]
Sent: 17 September 2012 15:55
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Ignorance
Hi,
On 17 Sep 2012, at 15:02, Nick Hillia
5 matches
Mail list logo