nanog@nanog.org

Hey folks, I had a situation recently that our network went down and our Network Monitoring software did not notify us that the network was down because the internet connection went down. We had a problem with our carrier where they messed up on our /23(where our Network Monito

nanog@nanog.org

Hello folks, I would like to the OID number for displaying the number of routers that your EBGP peer has received. Thank you in advanced. Michael Ruiz

nanog@nanog.org

Hello all, I am having very unusual problem with the CSM. This is what my problems. I have my active CSM setup for a Fault Tolerance group with a priority of 100 and an alternate of 30 and set to preempt. Now for some reason I cannot get the standby configure to get the config

Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

I know where I have worked we have had a mixture of Juniper and Cisco equipment. Personally buying a Juniper Router like a M or a T series is like buying a Ferrari. I like Cisco personally and they are cheaper than buying a Juniper. For example a M-series is always going to cost some bucks after

RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

ng I love about the JUNOS is the rollback command. Whew I can tell you a few times where that has saved my bacon a few times and the commit and check command. :-) -Original Message- From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:41 PM To: Michael Ruiz Cc: n

RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Yeah you are right it does have some JUNOS like feel. -Original Message- From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org] Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:58 PM To: Michael Ruiz Cc: Jack Bates; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Is Cisco equpiment de f

RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?

On Jan 13, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Jack Bates wrote: > On 1/13/2011 1:48 PM, Michael Ruiz wrote: >> Yeah another thing I love about the JUNOS is the rollback command. Whew >> I can tell you a few times where that has saved my bacon a few times and >> the commit and check command.:

How are you aggregating WAN customers these days?

I know the way I used to do it at a previous company is we deployed the Cisco 12000 series router with the CHOC12-DS1-IR-SC module so we can 336 T1 out of that puppy. The only down side is there is a limitation on the number of channel groups. If doing something other than just handing off

How are you aggregating WAN customers these days?

g to aggregate WAN customers (T1,T3, etc...) these days. What > platforms/devices are you using? What seems to be working/not working? > Any insights would be great! > > Thanks, > > Chris > > Michael Ruiz Senior Network Engineer LST Financial, Inc.

Authentication using Microsoft 2008 Active directory for Cisco RADIUS login

Hello all, I am having some trouble getting my Cisco routers to use Active directory to authenticate users. I have searched on Google and so far I am coming up dry on good documentation that will work. I have used these links. http://briandesmond.com/blog/how-to-authenticat

RE: Authentication using Microsoft 2008 Active directory for Cisco RADIUS login

>Can you post your config on the router? >Also, this may be better to post over at cisco-nsp. >B I decided to move away from RADIUS via Active Directory and turn up a Ubuntu TACACS+ server. Now it works. HAHA. Now it is time to create the template files. M.A.R

nanog@nanog.org

Hello All, I have been working for two days trying to get an ASA to setup a VPN tunnel to a SSG-550. I have the VPN tunnel Setup and ready to go on the ASA. I ran a Debug crypto IPSec 200 and crypto ikve1 200. I do the command ping PRIVATE and I get in the console Sending

Re:

: Friday, July 08, 2011 06:09 PM To: Michael Ruiz Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: > Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.1.4.81, timeout is 2 seconds: > IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-3: Looking for crypto map matching 5-tuple: > Prot=1, saddr=10.20.1.2, sport=29733, daddr=10.1.4.81, dp

nanog@nanog.org

received(new) Address family IPv4 Unicast: advertised and received Message statistics: What does exactly the message mean and how do I stabilize this? Any help will be appreciated. Michael Ruiz Network Engineer Office 210-448-0040 Cell 512-744-3826 mr...@telwestservices.com

RE:

size 65535 ip tcp synwait-time 10 ip tcp path-mtu-discovery -Original Message- From: Florian Weimer [mailto:f...@deneb.enyo.de] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 12:14 PM To: Mikael Abrahamsson Cc: Michael Ruiz; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: * Mikael Abrahamsson: >> What

RE:

From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:54 PM To: Michael Ruiz Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:28:02PM -0500, Michael Ruiz wrote: > Here is more of the configuration to do with TCP information. > > ip tcp se

RE:

009 3:40 PM To: Mikael Abrahamsson; Michael Ruiz Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: And more specifically, possibly an interface MTU (or ip mtu, I forget which). If there is a mismatch between ends of a link, in one direction, MTU-sized packets get sent, and the other end sees those as "gia

RE:

inal Message- From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:53 PM To: Brian Dickson Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson; Michael Ruiz; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 05:39:33PM -0300, Brian Dickson wrote: > And more specifically, possibl

RE:

f 9 routers is not being established. Since I have a switch between the 7606 and 7206, I plan to put a packet capture server and see what I can see. -Original Message- From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:07 PM To: Michael Ruiz Cc: Br

RE:

And is that the one that traverses the 3550 with the 1500 byte MTU? Both connection traver through the 3550. I will disable the command on 7206 vxr. thanks -Original Message- From: "Richard A Steenbergen" To: "Michael Ruiz" Cc: "Brian Dickson" ; "na

RE:

, last write 00:00:02, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds Neighbor capabilities: -Original Message- From: Michael Ruiz Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 7:47 AM To: Richard A Steenbergen; Michael Ruiz Cc: Brian Dickson; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: And is that the one

RE:

ething like this or weird happens. Thank you all. -Original Message- From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:r...@e-gerbil.net] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:11 PM To: Michael Ruiz Cc: Brian Dickson; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:17:00AM -0500, Michael Ruiz

nanog@nanog.org

host 206.193.221.32 any permit udp any host 206.193.221.36 permit udp host 206.193.221.36 any permit udp any eq 5060 any eq 5060 permit udp any host 206.193.221.35 permit udp host 206.193.221.35 any Michael Ruiz mr...@telwestservices.com <mailto::mr...@telwestservices.com>

nanog@nanog.org

I found the issue. I found that one of the techs had applied the service-policy against an interface that is on the 6-CT3 line card. This caused the error I found. I took out the service policy applied and applied the tx-cos command and problem fixed. Michael Ruiz mr

nanog@nanog.org

Group, I am stuck like chuck. We are unable to activate a VPN in one of the virtual firewall context. Under the crypto commands, none of the IP-sec are available. Any help on this would be appreciated. Version we running is 8.0(4) Michael Ruiz mr

RE:

Thank you for your help for this question. Have a good day. -Original Message- From: Tillinger, Steve [mailto:steve.tillin...@sourcemedia.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:00 PM To: Michael Ruiz; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: IPsec isn't available when in multiple context

Having trouble trying to activate a GigE connection>

description AR4-DLLSTXHW-GE0/0 no ip address speed nonegotiate Michael Ruiz Network Engineer

RE: Having trouble trying to activate a GigE connection>

uesday, November 24, 2009 10:25 AM To: Michael Ruiz; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Having trouble trying to activate a GigE connection> Hello Michael: > -Original Message- > From: Michael Ruiz [mailto:mr...@telwestservices.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:02 AM > To:

RE: Having trouble trying to activate a GigE connection>

12:39 PM To: Michael Ruiz Cc: Michael K. Smith - Adhost; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Having trouble trying to activate a GigE connection> I have seen this behavior caused by a mismatch of SFPs, SX on one side and LX on the other. /p On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Michael Ruiz wrote:

recommendation on vendor for 8 Cisco 7201 routers?

IPV6 Training Books

Hello All, I am looking for some good reading material to get a better understanding of IPV6. I know how to convert HEX into decimal format. What I am looking for is how to under the CIDR notation and break them out into subnets. Thank you in advance. MAR.

IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Robert Bonomi https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>> wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 04:18:00 +0200 >> From: Alexander Maassen > scarynet.org> >> Subject: Re: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the

RE: recommendation on vendor for 8 Cisco 7201 routers?

Cool How is their service? Do they Telecom equipment. For example, Adtran and Fujitsu equipment? -Original Message- From: David DiGiacomo [mailto:dav...@corp.nac.net] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:49 PM To: Michael Ruiz; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: recommendation on vendor for 8

RE: recommendation on vendor for 8 Cisco 7201 routers?

Ok cool. I will keep them mind for Cisco equipment. Thank you sir for your reply. -Original Message- From: David DiGiacomo [mailto:dav...@corp.nac.net] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:06 PM To: Michael Ruiz; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: recommendation on vendor for 8 Cisco 7201 routers

RE: IPV6 Training Books

Thank you all for replying. -Original Message- From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:23 PM To: Michael Ruiz; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: IPV6 Training Books > -Original Message- > From: Michael Ruiz [mai