Re: provider email maintenance standard

https://www.facebook.com/groups/maintnote/ On 17/06/19 15:14, Andrew Dampf wrote: > Hello nanog, > > I've heard second-hand there is an existing standard for provider > maintenance emails that should be followed in the form of a calendar > attachment, but I can't seem to find any information on i

Re: constraining RPKI Trust Anchors

Hi Job, I think this is important work. As you indicated in your mail you have spent quite some time compiling the constraints files in the appendix. Keeping them up to date requires tracking allocations and policy developments in all RIRs. It reminds me of bogon filters for unallocated IP sp

Re: Route Server Filters at IXPs and 4-byte ASNs

Jeffrey, On Tue, 4 Feb 2014 22:53:40 -0500 Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Jan 25, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > > >> On 25/01/2014 15:48, Sebastian Spies wrote: > >> To make things worse: even if the IXPs ASN is 2-byte, I would assume, > >> that RS impleme

Re: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?

each L2 neighbor individually. Something like draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-03, which was mentioned before in this thread. With this in place individual sets of peers could safely use different MTUs on the same VLAN, and IXPs would have a migration path towards supporting larger framesizes. --

Re: Network configuration archiving

On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:07:49 +0300 Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2013-10-24 23:05 -0400), Erik Muller wrote: > > > Rancid certainly has its warts, but other than needing to test, pull > > hair, and patch things for new OS/platform deployments, it still > > generally Just Works once you have it installe

Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes

Hello Leo, On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:18:13 -0600 Leo Bicknell wrote: > This whole problem smacks to me of exchange points that are "too big to > fail". Since some of these exchanges are so big, everyone else must bend to > their needs. I think the world would be a better place if some of these

Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions

Hi, On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:44:56 -0800 Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 04:36:28PM -0500, > Christopher Morrow wrote: > > leaking the IX prefix to customers, to me, seems like a recipe for > > much wider/unintended leakage :( > > Oh, it is. I remember when MAE