On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:41:16PM -0400, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
> Are there examples of an ISP getting sued because it redirected traffic
> that should have gone to original site ?
This happened with Paxfire (and the ISPs that used them) in 2011.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/07/wides
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:49:31AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 10/24/2010 09:26, Brandon Kim wrote:
> >
> > Wow that is amazing and quite impressive that you even run the antenna
> > linesinteresting..do you have to pay for the GPS service?
> >
>
>
> Make your own simple GPS NTP c
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:17:10AM -0700, Network IP Dog wrote:
> FYI!!!
>
> http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/microsoftpri0/2016132391_microsoft_dee
> ms_all_diginotar_certificates_untrust.html
>
> Google and Mozilla have also updated their browsers to block all DigiNotar
> certificates, whi
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:34:43PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > > Because of that lost trust, any cross-signed cert would likely be revoked
> > > by
> > > the browsers. It would also make the browser vendors question whether the
> > > signing CA is worthy of their trust.
> >
> > To pop up the sta
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:00:47PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> Note that a big weak point in the DNS is the interface between the
> registrars and the registry. If you have a domain you have to trust the
> registry to impose suitable restrictions on its registrars to prevent a
> dodgy registrar from
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:20:04PM -0700, Robert Glover wrote:
> Covad (or should I say Megapath now..),
>
> You have DNS servers that are failing to resolve anything at this time:
>
> 64.105.172.26 and 64.105.172.27 are both failing.
>
> This is a Bad Thing as these are the servers that the maj
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:21:05PM -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jay Ashworth"
>
> > > Previously, Netflix signed similar agreements with Comcast and
> > > Verizon.
> > >
> > > http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/29/netflix-and-att-sign-peering-agreement/
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:55:43AM -0400, Brett Charbeneau wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>
> WAS> While I applaud your taking security seriously, and your active
> monitoring
> WAS> of your resources, other folks might be handling huge numbers of
> Conficker,
> WAS>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:20:33AM -0500, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>Where are these quotes coming from ?
That particular one:
http://redtape.msnbc.com/2010/01/gregory-fayer-opened-an-e-mail-on-monday-night-that-looked-like-it-was-from-a-fellow-lawyer-at-gipson-hoffman-pancione-inst.html
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:42:24PM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>I can make a very good case that CALEA was not just originally intended
> for voice, but was sold to Congress as something that didn't apply to data
> networks. The EFF has said it better than I could, though, so look at
> ht
10 matches
Mail list logo
