On 8/24/2012 11:33 AM, Routing Analysis Role Account wrote:
[...]
> Analysis Summary
>
>
> BGP routing table entries examined: 264582
Isn't this supposed to be >400K? What happened this week?
-Lori
> Prefixes after maximum aggregation:
ore overhead in terms of
> encapsulation/etc. than the GRE tunnels I use and has limited (if any)
> functionality
> for IPv4 (which GRE supports nicely).
Maybe you meant ILNP here? AFAIK, IPv4 and IPv6 are equal citizens for LISP.
Regards,
-Lori Jakab
> Owen
>
On 04/11/2011 05:02 PM, harbor235 wrote:
> http://www.lisp4.net/
Agreed, this is the best starting point.
I'm working on a draft about LISP deployment, feedback is always welcome:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jakab-lisp-deployment
-Lori
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Christina
e Section 4 of
the LISP deployment document:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jakab-lisp-deployment-03#section-4
Regards,
--
Lori Jakab
UPC Advanced Broadband Communications Center
inks why that's the case:
http://evilrouters.net/2011/04/11/its-time-to-move-on-from-centos/
Regards,
Lori Jakab
5 matches
Mail list logo