On 16 nov 2010, at 18.08, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/16/internet-traffic-reportedly-routed-chinese-servers/
I can detect from the report that this has anything to do with i.root? Can you
explain that?
Looking at the dates referred to it seem more
On 17 nov 2010, at 07.17, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 1:08 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/16/internet-traffic-reportedly-routed-chinese-servers/
>
> I have read the article and the list, and I'm puzzled. It's pretty clear that
> t
On 17 nov 2010, at 15.37, Lindqvist Kurt Erik wrote:
>
> On 16 nov 2010, at 18.08, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/16/internet-traffic-reportedly-routed-chinese-servers/
>
> I can detect from the report that this has anythin
On 17 nov 2010, at 15.37, Lindqvist Kurt Erik wrote:
>
> On 16 nov 2010, at 18.08, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>
>> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/16/internet-traffic-reportedly-routed-chinese-servers/
>
> I can detect from the report that this has anythin
On 3 okt 2011, at 16:30, Todd Underwood wrote:
>
> ignoring randy (and others) off-topic comments about hypocrisy, this
> situation is fundamentally a situation of bad (or different) network
> policy being applied outside of its scope. i would prefer that china
> not censor the internet, sure.
All,
Renesys has since a few days had a blog post at
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2010/06/two-strikes-i-root.shtml. On the 9th I
urged them to provide us with any data if they are seeing incorrect responses
from NAY i.root-servers.net instance, and share that with n...@
All,
This is to inform you that, we (Netnod/Autonomica, operators of
i.root-servers.net) have been notified by IANA that on our request an
record will be added to the root-zone with serial number 2010061700.
Best regards,
- kurtis -
---
Kurt Erik Lindqvist, CEO
kur...@netnod.se,
On 1 jul 2010, at 15.20, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> n Jul 1, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
>> The question is because gTLDs operations are in the USA, does it mean that
>> the USA have control over all those domain names?
>>
>> Can we trust solely the USA for such control?
>>
>> T
8 matches
Mail list logo
