rm reverse lookups
on the client IP's). As others have pointed out, as long
as there's a valid nameserver responding, a lack of PTR
record would not cause issues as an NXDOMAIN record would
be sent back immediately and the Google Analytics server
will move on.
-Larry Blunk
Merit
regards,
Job
On Mar 4, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
whois -h whois.radb.net 198.41.0.0
fgets: Connection reset by peer
:( larry blunk has helped in the past to fix this...
On 12/22/2011 02:36 PM, Sean Harlow wrote:
iperf might be able to do what you need and there are Windows builds available,
but I'm not sure if it has a mode where it's not flooding the network trying to
test maximum speed. Is there a reason that standard ICMP pings aren't
appropriate if you j
from addresses who have
not posted recently, in addition to other filtering mechanisms.
Regards,
Larry Blunk
NANOG Communications Committee
adm...@nanog.org
Looks like the prefix in question is 208.91.48.0/22
and it was briefly announced by 7018 yesterday, but
that announcement seems to be gone now. I see 11734
is announcing 208.91.48.0/22 + 208.91.48.0/24 now,
but not 208.91.49.0/24 - 208.91.51.0/24.
On 06/25/2010 10:17 AM, Christopher Morro
Unfortunately, the require_explicit_destination option
was not set in the MailMan config for the NANOG list.
This has been corrected.
Regards,
Larry Blunk
Merit
Marc-Antoine.Chabot wrote:
Interesting.. It's bouncing from a yahoo.co.jp group to the Nanog list.
Anyone k
Randy Bush wrote:
/126 - Router p2p
/127, see
MATSUZAKI Yoshinobu gave a talk describing the ping pong attack on /127
at a ripe or apricot or both. both web sites are absolutely horrid at
letting one find talks (see nanog for an example of good).
randy
Here's a link to the talk -
Apologies for the RADB downtime. Service was down
from roughly 7:45PM - 8:51PM EST last night. We've been
having some issues due to heavy querying from
a PlanetLab project and are currently working
with them to resolve the issue.
-Larry Blunk
Merit Network
Shin Yamasaki wrote:
> Hi
Scott Weeks wrote:
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --
From: Marshall Eubanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So, do you think this was lots of little tests / hijacks / mistakes ?
Or did it just not propagate very far ?
-
According to Andree Toonk (and
Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> % whois -h whois.ripe.net AS1712
> as-name:FR-RENATER-ENST
>
> % whois -h whois.arin.net AS1712
> OrgName:Twilight Communications
That would be ARIN, rather than RIPE:
http://www
DR
descr: Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
descr: 4 place Jussieu 75252 PARIS CEDEX 05
descr: FRANCE
origin: AS1717
advisory: AS690 1:1800 2:1239(144) 3:1133 4:1674
comm-list: COMM_NSFNET
mnt-by: MAINT-AS1717
changed: ren...@renater.fr 950510
source: RADB
-Larry Blunk
Merit
Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Tomoya Yoshida wrote:
Thank you Geoff.
I asked because I could see 1/8 of merit AS237 but couldn't see
of origin AS36561 for those two in database.
Even if it's an experiment and sort term, It's better to be registerd
in right origi
Mirko Maffioli wrote:
I'm searching for a switch with at least one 10Gbase-T ethernet port
and some gigabit ethernet for lab test.
>From cisco web site i've seen for example a 3560 model with X2 module
and CX4 port but nothing with 10Gb-T.
Unfortunately my budget couldn't arrive to nexus or cat6
On 03/24/2011 10:06 AM, Joe Provo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:27:29PM +, Tony Finch wrote:
Jay Nakamura wrote:
666,624 is kind of odd number, isn't it? That comes out to a
/13,/15,/19,/21 and a /22.
> From the court documents I gather that it is a collection of miscellaneous
block
14 matches
Mail list logo
