On 12/3/2010 8:16 AM, Neil Harris wrote:
On 02/12/10 20:21, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Comcast has around ~15 million high speed Internet subscribers (based on
year old data, I'm sure it is higher), which means at peak usage around
0.3% of all Comcast high speed users would be watching.
That's an in
On 12/5/2010 9:50 AM, Gadi Evron wrote:
I withhold comment... "discuss amongst yourselves".
Best,
Gadi.
Original Message
Subject: [funsec] And Google becomes a DNS..
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 17:34:50 +0200
From: Imri Goldberg
To: funsec
Found on reddit:
http://i.imgur.com
Have you considered argus?
It can deliver "argus flows" from multiple interfaces.
From http://www.qosient.com/argus/ :
Argus can be considered an implementation of the architecture
described in the IETF IPFIX Working Group. Argus pre-dates IPFIX, and
the project has actively contributed to the I
I've found rapidssl wildcards are generally the cheapest (~$120), and
are not limited to a number of servers. In practice, neither are the
other brands.
Ken
On 12/27/2012 1:47 PM, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
> Ok, so this might be a little off topic but I am trying to validate something
> a vendor is t
theSSLstore has good reseller pricing on a variety of certs.
~ $10 domain validated rapidssl certs in about 5 minutes.
More expensive and time consuming certs are available, Verisign,
Geotrust, Thawte, greenbars, wildcards, etc..
Ken
On 1/6/2012 8:15 AM, Michael Carey wrote:
Looking for a reco
On 1/18/2012 1:45 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
On 18 Jan 2012, at 05:06, "toor" wrote:
Hi list,
I am wondering if anyone else has seen a large amount of DNS
queries coming from various IP ranges in China. I have been trying
to find a pattern in the attacks but so far I have come up blank. I
am
On 6/28/2012 6:05 AM, Tei wrote:
If you use these project that already do 99% of what the customer
need, plus a 120% the customer not need (and perhaps don't want). The
code quality will be normally be good, with **horrible** exceptions.
But sooner or later, (weeks) there will be exploits for
I wonder who that building on their website actually belongs to, or if
it even exists?
http://www.tineye.com/search/776bee3aea6d8f901758534a2fb3b9d5718ad256/
heh heh.
Ken
On 7/5/2013 8:06 AM, Alessandro Ratti wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a question for you.
> Anyone knows or has had to deal with
On 6/9/2010 1:43 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 6/9/2010 13:35, JC Dill wrote:
IMHO it is impossible to regulate the internet as a whole.
Exactly so.
That is precisely why you don't want somebody else to attempt it.
The only hope is for everybody to take personal responsibility for their
litt
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Raleigh Apple wrote:
Is anyone else out there aware that the UCEProtect Level 3 email blacklist
blocks entire AS?
Is there anyone out there aware of any significant (or larger than
'man and his dog on a DSL') mail provider using
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://youtube.com/
"It's not just you! http://youtube.com looks down from here."
Ken
Arno Meulenkamp wrote:
As part of our IPv6 training project, that consists of face to face
training and on-line learning modules and testimonials, we are proud to
announce
On 07/24/2009 06:39 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Chris Hills:
On the topic of mail rejection I have come across a few sites that
reject mail, even to postmaster@, from domains that have one or more
ipv6-only MX records listed (i.e. a domain name with but no A
record(s)). The common factor s
Anton Kapela wrote:
Streams are back up for the last day of NANOG, later covering ARIN for
the remainder of the week.
Since it's mostly talking heads, I've lowered the bitrate of the h264
versions, and removed cpu-consuming options (i.e. no CABAC)
~27 megabit MPEG2 HD: udp://233.0.236.20:123
King Spook wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I've only had to call them once (turned out to be our problem) but they were
reasonably helpful. If I had to compare it to any other freemail provider,
I would have to say Postini was fantastic.
Frank
[Sorry for the semi-h
Ray Burkholder wrote:
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document
networks.
Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me.
I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
What do you use?
OmniGraffle is the better Visio.
Omn
GD::Graph::lines does this easily, and there are plenty of examples to
work from. (might be too much a pain if you don't have GD available)
Ken
Scott Weeks wrote:
First, please don't respond with "use mrtg, rrdtool, cricket, etc, etc." Silly 'layer 8' reasons are keeping me from being able
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Feb 25, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Ray Corbin wrote:
It depends on your environment. I've seen where it is helpful and
where it is overwhelming. If you are a smaller company and want to
know why you keep getting blocked then those should help. If you are a
larger company and get a se
Tim Utschig wrote:
[Please reply off-list. I'll summarize back to the list if there
is more than a little interest in me doing so.]
Please do. There are many rural ISPs and WISPs that might benefit from a
decent look at these products, or any open source clones that might be
available to te
Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jo Rhett said:
Since
virtual web hosting has no technical justification for IP space, I
refuse it.
SSL and FTP are techincal justifications for an IP per site.
Right. Also, monthly bandwidth monitoring/shaping/capping are more
easily done using one i
Ricky Beam wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:22:08 -0400, Ken A wrote:
Also, monthly bandwidth monitoring/shaping/capping are more easily
done using one ip per hosted domain...
That's why the infrastructure is "virtualized" and you monitor at or
behind the firewall(s) and/or
Robert Kisteleki wrote:
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Anyone have a foolproof way to get grandma to always put "https://"; in
front of "www"?
I understand this is a huge can of worms, but maybe it's time to change
the default behavior of browsers from http to https...?
I'm sure it's doable in F
Paul Vixie wrote:
"Refuses to patch" sounds likes FUD.
go ask 'em, and let us all know what they say.
AT&T dsl line.
#dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT @68.94.157.1
z.y.x.w.v.u.t.s.r.q.p.o.n.m.l.k.j.i.h.g.f.e.d.c.b.a.pt.dns-oarc.net.
"65.68.49.31 is POOR: 26 queries in 1.4 seconds from 1
Steve Tornio wrote:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Duane Wessels wrote:
xpara.com tests to lock up my iPhone, or I would use that checker to
verify the iPhone DNS. Anyone have a link to a decent test that I
could run on the iPhone?
Give this one a try:
http://entropy.dns-oarc.net/test/
On 2/9/2011 3:17 PM, George Bonser wrote:
Hmm, I am not aware of Comcast (or any other large MSO) doing any NAT
on
large scale. Having said that almost all of the DSL customers in the
US
are being NAT'ed, but on the edge device (DSL modem) rather than in
the
core.
--
Scott Helms
Vice Presid
On 2/9/2011 3:50 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
On 2/9/2011 4:36 PM, Ken A wrote:
10/8 is the management network on my cable modem. The cable modem
bridges your wan 'real' ip(s) through to your PC or router. At least
that's how Suddenlink does it here. The customer is normally
On 2/10/2011 3:19 PM, George Herbert wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Fred Richards wrote:
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:47 PM, George Bonser wrote:
I have yet to see a broadband provider that configures a network so that
individual nodes in the home network get global IPs.
One huge re
26 matches
Mail list logo
