-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Tuppence wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am seeing that www.google.cat resolves from three different networks.
> It even resolves from here: http://www.squish.net/dnscheck/
>
> What is going on?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
Because .CAT is a valid TLD:
http:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Wyble wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm currently experiencing a DDOS attack on my home DSL connection.
>
> Thousands of requests to port 80.
>
> I'm on an SBC business class account.
>
> I'm guessing that calling the regular customer support won't get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Kibler wrote:
> Charles Wyble wrote:
>> All,
>
>> I'm currently experiencing a DDOS attack on my home DSL connection.
>
>> Thousands of requests to port 80.
>
>> I'm on an SBC business class accoun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is anyone else that uses ServerBeach hosting having issues with their name
servers (ns[12].geodns.net) failing to resolve their hostnames?
Jon K
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Charleston,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Astrodog wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Jon Kibler wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is anyone else that uses ServerBeach hosting having issues with their name
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Franklin wrote:
>> Is anyone else that uses ServerBeach hosting having issues with their name
>> servers (ns[12].geodns.net) failing to resolve their hostnames?
>
> I haven't seen any recent problems, although I have the geodns servers slaving
> f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
u...@3.am wrote:
>
> pop.gmail.com is answering on port 995 (pop3 ssl) as well, so I think
> it's safe to assume this is probably a httpd-side problem.
>
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Jeff Kell wrote:
>
Google says they have issues with gmail:
http://gm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zhiyun Qian wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the common practice for enforcing port blocking policy (or what
> is the common practice for you and your ISP)? More specifically, when
> ISPs try to block certain outgoing port (port 25 for instance), they
> c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Jon Kibler wrote:
>> To answer that question, I would start with ingress and egress filtering by
>> IP
>> address, protocol, etc.:
>>1) Never allow traffic to egress any subnet unless its source
ack down poachers who
temporarily squat on an unallocated block and announce it to the world.
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Charleston, SC USA
o: 843-849-8214
c: 843-813-2924
s: 843-564-4224
s: JonRKibler
e: jon.kib...@aset.com
e: j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> Well, we *could* hunt down the perpetrators, pool some $$, and hire 3 or 4
> baseball-bat wielding professional explainers to go explain our position to
> them. Figuring out how to do so without breaking any laws is t
s stuff first and asked to release
> an emergency patch.
>
> --srs
According to Cisco, there is nothing to patch:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sr-20080516-rootkits.shtml
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Cha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My highly reliable grapevine is reporting: "just heard that it is due to
a game release (Metal Gear , some kind of playstation bundle). I guess
some bots try to order it."
Jon
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Tec
TCP is used for zone transfers.
If my server responded to TCP queries from anyone other than a secondary
server, I would be VERY concerned.
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Charleston, SC USA
o: 843-849-8214
c: 843-224-2494
s: 843-5
ponses. Is this correct?
Also, other than "That's what the RFCs call for," why use TCP for data
exchange instead of larger UDP packets?
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Charleston, SC USA
o: 843-849-8214
c: 843-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill Owens wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 02:14:55PM -0400, Jon Kibler wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Mark Price wrote:
>>
>>> >From what I have read, public DNS server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JoeSox wrote:
> Hello Newbie here (hopefully I have the correct list),
>
Not based on any standard, but here is a schema I have used many times:
White -- user workstations
Black -- telephones
Green -- guest users (direct Internet connection)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Shultz wrote:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On that note, it will be very interesting to see who manages to register
> the *.sucks TLD, and what they do with it.
>
Well, I guess this shoots in the foot Microsoft's name server best
practices of set
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> On Jun 27, 2008, at 5:20 AM, Jon Kibler wrote:
>
> Jeff Shultz wrote:
>>>> Owen DeLong wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On that note, it will be very interesting to see who manages to regi
netblocks being advertised are
unallocated (or, unused within an allocated block). In the past, before
botnets were so common, spammers would often hijack unused netblocks,
advertise routes to them, flood spam from them, then the routes would
disappear, making it impossible to track the spammers.
Jon Ki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SANS is reporting that Kaminsky's DNS bug may be now being exploited in
the wild. See:
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?n&storyid=4765
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Techno
se I can then use it to
> connect machines together in a pinch.
>
Hubs are still available that are REAL hubs. I got 4 netgears about a
year ago and they are still available.
However, there is a problem with your specification: No hub (that I am
aware of) can do 1Gbps. All hubs are 10/100
.
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Charleston, SC USA
o: 843-849-8214
c: 843-224-2494
s: 843-564-4224
My PGP Fingerprint is:
BAA2 1F2C 5543 5D25 4636 A392 515C 5045 CF39 4253
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Kibler wrote:
> BTW, despite the fact that Cisco says exploits are available, there is
> not the first mention of this vulnerability on the WebEx web site.
I really hate to reply to my own postings, but in this case I will make
an excepti
with building /
installing the package and your opinion of the documentation available.
TIA for your help!
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Officer
Advanced Systems Engineering Technology, Inc.
Charleston, SC USA
o: 843-849-8214
c: 843-224-2494
s: 843-564-4224
My PGP Fingerprint is:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert D. Scott wrote:
> Does this MAC present itself all the time, or just during boot?
>
> Marvel makes a NIC prevalent in some Dell systems, that presents MAC
> 0c00.. during its startup process. If you run port security, and
> several peop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will a Yahoo Postmaster please contact me off list?
No one is responding to my web based complaints about Yahoo dropping
email we are sending to our own staff's Yahoo email accounts.
TIA!
Jon Kibler
- --
Jon R. Kibler
Chief Technical Of
27 matches
Mail list logo
