a deep
breath, grabbed a box of dry ice, ran into the server room and emptied
the box on top of the racks. The backup person was watching through
the glass door - just in case, you know, ready to start the rescue
operation.
We (and the servers) survived till the technician arrived. And we had
a lot of dry ice to cool the beer..
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
enerating
Global IDs use a functionally similar algorithm to ensure there is a
high probability of uniqueness."
I'm not sure where did you find the examples you've mentioned. If it's
just a documentation example - seems to be fine. If someone is doing
it in real networks - that's just not right..
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
gt; AS path: 6453 39386 25019 I Unrecognized Attributes:
>> 39
>> >>> > bytes
>> >>> > AS path: Attr flags e0 code 80: 00 00 fd 88 40 01 01
>> 02
>> >>> > 40 02 04 02 01 5b a0 c0 11 04 02 01 fc da 80 04 04 00 00 00 01 40 05
>> 04
>> >>> > 00 00 00 64
>> >>> > Accepted Multipath
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -Jonas
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> Yup! We're seeing the same thing too, and we're filtering it out.
>> >>> Originating AS is 25019
>> >>>
>> >>> -Clay
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
nc. procedures/policies) - but see #4
above..
So there is a gap - those control networks are 10 (20?) years behind
internet in terms of security. This gap can be filled but not
immediately.
The good news that such stories as the one we are discussing could
help scary the decision makers..oops, sorry,
there any other scenario?
There is still equipment around which doesn't support ISIS but support OSPF.
Getting such boxes into a network which is using ISIS might lead to
running both protocols together.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
y are seeing the link-local address as the next-hop, but
>>> are unable to get an ND entry for it, and thus cannot forward traffic to me.
>>>
>>>
>>> -Randy
>>>
>>> --
>>> | Randy Carpenter
>>> | Vice President - IT Services
>>> | Red Hat Certified Engineer
>>> | First Network Group, Inc.
>>> | (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
on second thought - why are they using link-local as the next-hop in
the first place if the eBGP session is established over GUA?
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
...
Yep, that's why I was asking - but it doesn't explain how/why ND for
GUA works in this case.
--
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> Everyone loves IPv6, and it's a fantastic technology. However, I've been
> pondering a few quirks of v6, including the low priority of PTR, but I have
> a question I want to throw out there:
>
> Do you think IPv6 geolocatoin (GeoIP) will eve
prise to be multihomed
w/o getting PI or PA address space so they are usually pretty happy
with it.
>as well as if this would potentially create any problems by 2
> Autonomous Systems both originating the same prefix.
AFAIR prefixes can be originated by more than one AS so there
shoul
10 matches
Mail list logo
