On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm curious what other NANOGers have in their home compute centers? On
> the extreme end of course we have mr morris :)
> with his uber lab: http://smorris.uber-geek.net/lab.htm
>
>
I try to maximize cost-effectiveness whereve
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Glen Kent wrote:
> Yahoo, Google, etc applications are running on one server and each
> application could be theoretically associated with a unique VXLAN tag. This
> way service providers will be able to provide QoS per application (by
> effectively providing QoS t
Re-posting for those having difficulties:
tinyurl.com/nanog58-slides
Chris Chase gave a good presentation on this subject in ~November.
Here's the abstract, quoted from:
http://gogonet.gogo6.com/profile/ChrisChase
|
| Posted by Chris Chase on October 28, 2011 at 5:59pm
| Send Message View Blog
|
| IPv6 service at AT&T.
|
| AT&T has dual stack service ava
I have sites using "all of the above", and concur with Owen's comment
regarding it being a "personal preference" issue.
RA route learning simply "works", and I (surprisingly) have not yet
had problems where the high/med/low settings were not correctly
honored (95% Cent/Deb environments, FWIW). FA
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
>> http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
>>
>> I can hear people, say oh no
>>
>> Interesting to see that marketers do not lik
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> It will certainly be entertaining to see what behaviors the various
>> CPEs default to on the public-facing side. In the NetGear WNDR3700's
>> case after upgrading its firmware, options were included for:
>> Disabled (default)
>> Auto-
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 3:15 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>> On 2/18/11 6:30 AM, "Matt Newsom" wrote:
>>
>> > I am looking for a switch with a minimum of 12 X
> 10GE
>> >ports on it, that can has routing protocol support and can do GRE in
>> >hardware. Does anyone have a suggestion th
>>
>>
>> Brocade TurboIron 24X fits all of those criteria.
>>
>> -Jeff
>
> Last time I checked, the TI24x wouldn't do GRE.
>
>
>
It was updated last year -- apparently handled in HW now.
24 ports of 10GE, routing, GRE, and small form-factor = everything the
original inquiry listed.
FYI,
-Jeff
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2011 1:32 AM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>>
>>
>> In message <4df053aa.50...@axu.tm>, Aleksi Suhonen writes:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Some people were talking about Large Scale NATs (LSN) or Carrier Grade
>> > NATs (CGN) yesterday. Comment
> Indeed. Unfortunately there's no good way to support v6-only clients in
> an environment, where dual stacked endpoints do exist as well, see
> RFC6147 (DNS64) ch. 6.3.2.
>
> We still need to find some solution to that problem.
>
We've been using two workarounds:
1. Separate DNS resolvers (both B
11 matches
Mail list logo
