S3 objects in Parler are now showing " All access to this object has
been disabled"
This error means you are trying to access a bucket that has been locked
down by AWS so that nobody can access it, regardless of permissions -- all
access has been disabled.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:06 AM Mic
unimus is great I've used it for simple sites. rConfig is better as there
is no licensing and open source. It's more involved at setting up but worth
it.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:20 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I've been using Unimus since before 0.3.0 (as I see it contains a number
> of additions
Sorry, RANCID is open source. rConfig is not.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:46 AM Jason Kuehl wrote:
> unimus is great I've used it for simple sites. rConfig is better as there
> is no licensing and open source. It's more involved at setting up but worth
> it.
>
> On Wed
Anyone else with Comcast have a small outage? About 5-7 minutes?
--
Sincerely,
Jason W Kuehl
Cell 920-419-8983
jason.w.ku...@gmail.com
>From Comcast's own charts. Looks like something did happen over their
ethernet internet and private ethernet.
[image: image.png]
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:37 PM Neil Hanlon wrote:
> Yeah, had several test nodes transiting to me fail via Comcast it seems.
>
> On Wed, Feb 24,
Comcast's Outage id number OE118864040
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:42 PM Jason Kuehl
wrote:
> From Comcast's own charts. Looks like something did happen over their
> ethernet internet and private ethernet.
>
> [image: image.png]
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at
I'm looking for a contact, email, number, smoke signals for someone at
Google I can talk to on geolocation issue. For some reason Google has
labeled our IP ranges as Belarus when we're located in the states. If
anyone can point me at any contact I would be really happy..
.
--
Sincerely,
Jason W
;
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:18 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
>>
>>> I've discovered that if you *CAN* get a Google ISP account, you can
>>> manage it all there.
>>>
>>> If you can't, well, you're up shit creek without a paddle.
>>
Log a ticket in the console. No one will help you until the ticket is in.
Contact your TAM if you have one and give them the ticket number.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:36 PM Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> If you have Direct Connects you should be able to log a ticket in the AWS
> console, no? And/or the c
The one thing we did since we run full tunnel was moving our conference
solution off the full tunnel requirements. We did this for a few other
heavy hitters as well. (Youtube, Spotify.)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jared Mauch wrote:
> I’m wondering what general trends people have seen with th
Smokeping
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:19 PM Matt Erculiani wrote:
> Don’t forget you can use any port/protocol for MTR and traceroute, which
> is basically all the fancy apps will do, just automatically.
>
> $ mtr -T -P 443 den01.example.com
>
> This will send 443 tcp syn packets that should bypa
If you have a contact at VMware in their security department please contact
me off-list.
Or if you know of the good email to send security-related issues to send
that over as well.
--
Sincerely,
Jason W Kuehl
Cell 920-419-8983
jason.w.ku...@gmail.com
One Summer is overdue for its annual fire.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:14 PM Rod Beck
wrote:
> Does everyone agree that the 4 most important data centers are 1 Summer,
> Coresite, INAP, and 300 Bent Street. Both 1 Summer and Coresite clearly
> below in that group. Not sure about INAP and 300 Bent
Its dead JIM. I also can't get in starting around 7 est
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:19 AM Drew Weaver via NANOG
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Woke up this morning to a bunch of reports of issues with connectivity had
> to shut down some Level3/CTL connections to get it to return to normal.
>
>
>
> As of
Well, When I tried calling I got a fast busy, so that's nice.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:33 AM David Hubbard
wrote:
> Same. Also, as reported on outages list, what’s even worse is that they
> appear to be continuing to propagate advertisements from circuits whose
> sessions have been turned down
I'm over in MA in a CL building, it's very much still broken. I shut down
the interfaces to CL and now just using Comcast.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:20 AM Andy Brezinsky wrote:
> Started about 5:05am central, started clearing up for me about 7:15am.
> My route from ATT in Chicago is still going
People are rebooting ghosting now.
[image: image.png]
https://twitter.com/ir_kujoe/status/1300066569645707265
Seeing other reports of this too.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:45 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> That site seems to be just for their cloud products, is there one of these
> for their actual net
How is that acceptable behavior?
It's not, the best part. There RCA will be terrible. "Bad Regex" or the
best I ever got was "Bad cable" just two words... My contact is ending
soon...
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:29 AM Antonios Chariton
wrote:
> Reporting from Europe, any IP with them in the pat
I've been burning before. I'll wait at least an hour before turning my
links back on.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:31 AM Job Snijders wrote:
> I believe from this moment forward things are converging back to normal.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
>
--
Sincerely,
Jason W Kuehl
Cell 920-419-8983
jaso
At the end of the day, the business needs to besides to take that cost. All
you can do is document, and talk about the risks.
Save that email for that "I told you so moment"
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:50 AM Mike Bolitho wrote:
> That's all we can do. Thankfully I work for an org that understand
If the client pays me a shit ton of money to make sure the server
won't turn off, and they pay for the hardware to make it happen. I;d think
about it. It's a like a colo move on hardmode.
Its extremely stupid, and I would advise not doing it.
Hell even when I migrated e911 server, we had a 20 min
Amazon Fire TV, Apple TV and Alphabet Android TV executives don't see a
need to support emergency alerts on their products.
You can enable severe weather alerts on both google home and Alexia. But I
get the point.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:58 PM Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> As some of the largest wi
For whatever reason Comcast Xfinity is blocking my VPN URL. I've started
the process to unblock, and I'm trying to get a hold of their security team
to resolve this. I've been bounced around all morning.
Does anyone have a contact at Comcast that can whitelist a URL or get me to
a team that can un
issue.
I'm trying to find out why Comcast why they did the block to start with and
how to white list.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Chris Boyd wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 10, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Jason Kuehl
> wrote:
> >
> > For whatever reason Comcast Xfinity is bl
This is an SSL VPN that is being blocked. This is what failure looks like.
Curl is the same.
Once we disable the Xfi Advanced Security everyone can connect.
[image: image.png]
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:01 AM Jim Popovitch via NANOG
wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-09-10 at 10:31 -0400, Jason Ku
Looks like they run there own nameservers and I see the soa records are
even missing.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021, 12:23 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> Here’s a screenshot:
>
>
>
> -mel beckman
>
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 9:06 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
>
> https://downdetector.com/status/facebook/
>
> Normally n
Yeah it looks like there dns servers are just dead. I can't get an response
from them.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021, 12:26 PM Dmitry Sherman wrote:
> same problem in Israel
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+dmitry=interhost@nanog.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke
> *Sent:* Monday, 4 Oct
it back online. The post mortem should be an interesting
>>> read.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:46 AM Jason Kuehl
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like they run there own nameservers and I see the soa records are
>>>> even missin
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1445100931947892736?s=20
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:01 PM Tony Wicks wrote:
> Didn't write that part of the automation script and that coder left...
>
> > I got a mail that Facebook was leaving NLIX. Maybe someone botched the
> > script so they took down all B
Yep, I completely agree. I also think if they had done anything else, it
would have been a reputation-ending.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:19 AM Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
> I believe it is a proper response, besides that it is not right for ICANN
> to get in the middle of this type of conflict, in situa
I would be willing to travel down to help restore infra; I did this back
around Sandy as well. Is there anyone we can contact?
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:51 PM scott via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> On 8/17/23 2:03 AM, John Levine wrote:
> > According to Eric Kuhnke :
> >> -=-=-=-=-=-
> >>
> >> It's my un
Is it possible, yes. I've seen it several times now at my place of work.
Targeted attacks are a thing.
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 2:53 AM Mike Hale wrote:
> Oh for fucks sake.
>
> Really?
>
> You two are questioning someone who subscribes to Nanog over Fedex?
> You really think it's more likely tha
Unknown but this looks very different from before.
https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:18 AM Stephen Satchell wrote:
> Are we having another BGP problem this morning?
>
--
Sincerely,
Jason W Kuehl
Cell 920-419-8983
jason.w.ku...@gmail.com
We use https://cbackup.me/en/ over Rancid
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 11:38 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Awesome list
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 19:42 Ryan Hamel wrote:
>
>> My List:
>>
>> Oxidized as a replacement for RANCID
>> Telegraf + InfluxDB = Tons of Grafana Dashboards
>> (Open Source Slack Alte
I did this at my current company with also using VM Palo Alto.
Greeting of testing out a plan to make sure its insane.
The key it keeping its all up todate down to the firmware version (I know
its not possible for some because virtual)
The things this wont find are hardware related faults or iss
I use the server version of GNS and I love it. I just need to VPN into my
DC and use my client to connect to GNS.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:22 PM Mike Bolitho wrote:
> EVE-NG is also really good. Just an FYI, GNS3 went through a major refresh
> about 18 months ago or so and it's so much better
Contact your TAM with your AWS ticket number and let them know about your
issue. I haven't seen anything as of yet but I'm still on my way into the
office. (No Friday alerts yet)
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 8:02 AM John Von Essen wrote:
> Anyone else seeing major issues in Europe? Starting midnight, 7
Science https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/
Give the data yourself.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM Rod Beck
wrote:
> Unfortunately, the science community disagrees with Rob and you.
>
>
> Have a great day, big guy.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Roderick.
>
>
> _
Nothing on the homepage but search is working. (boston)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:17 PM Charles Mills wrote:
> The reports I've seen showing it as a worldwide outage.
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:14 PM Nathan Brookfield <
> nathan.brookfi...@simtronic.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Australia too….
>>
>>
My company has many issues with Xfinity users using global protection on
the Xfinity network, not Comcast.
Does anyone have a contact email list or phone number I can use to reach a
real person or engineer who is not in support?
Thanks
Jason.
--
Sincerely,
Jason W Kuehl
Cell 920-419-8983
jason.
+1 for gross comment.
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote:
> I think I'd rate this one as "gross but technically not breaking any rules
> I suppose." (I couldn't find any at first glance, anyway.)
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:55 PM Ryan Hamel
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > A
The better way to go ahead and get a hold of Amazon for peering issues is
to open a ticket with them via AWS account with business support.
This is how I resolved issues with peering in the past.
On Mar 9, 2018 8:27 AM, "Joe Nelson" wrote:
> I've all but given up on trying to get a response fro
UBNT’s recent hostility to the open source community
What do you mean by that?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 12:02 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
> I don’t know about the device itself, but given UBNT’s recent hostility to
> the
> open source community, I won’t be buying their products anyway.
>
> Owen
>
> > On
Just like "S3 dependency check day" Thus begins "National 1.1.1.1 change
week" I've already around a few peaces of equipment sets with 1.1.1.1
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Seeing as how 1.1.1.1 isn’t suppose to be routed I’m not surpri
Not saying you're wrong. But people did it for whatever reason.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
> 1.0.0.0/8 was assigned to APNIC in 2010. Those who used it as a
> placeholder were doing it wrong. It is valid IP space. It just was not
> assigned until 2010.
>
>
> Justin W
45 matches
Mail list logo
