Hi,
We run an Internet filtering service for protecting kids and folks with
addiction issues. As of a couple of days ago, walmart.com stopped responding to
requests (connection is formed but no response) through our filtering servers.
If anyone here from Walmart could contact me off list, that
on a single static.
-J
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
william...@digitar.com
V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727
www.digitar.com
On Dec 3, 2010, at 4:47 PM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>
>> This came up in another thread yesterday or today, and I just
We've been using IPplan for about 5 years pretty effectively. It could use a UI
refresh but it's decent.
-J
----
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
william...@digitar.com
V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727
www.digitar.com
On Apr 26, 2010, at 10:08 AM, Phil Regn
I'd recommend BGP4 Inter-Domain Routing in the Internet by Stewart. Was very
helpful when I was learning.
-J
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
william...@digitar.com
V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727
www.digitar.com
On May 17, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Doug Barton
Hi Guys,
All things being equal (which they're usually not) you could use the ACK
response time of the TCP handshake if they've got TCP DNS resolution
available. Though again most don't for security reasons...
-J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
> The answer is simple- because they are supposed to be allowed. By
disallowing
> them you are breaking the agreed upon rules for the protocol. Before
> long it becomes impossible to implement new features because you can't
be
> sure if someone else hasn't broken something intentionally.
I don
Hi All,
It seems to me reverse DNS just isn't an acceptable anti-spam measure.
Too many broken reverses exist with smaller companies (try getting a 3rd
party to fix it). It's not that hard for a bot to figure out a DSL's
reverse entry and use that for its HELO. And there are a lot more
effective
Hi Steve,
In my opinion, the first and fourth statements are not necessarily in
conflict. A reputation system based purely on reverses is pretty broken.
Also, it is not necessary to use it as a factor in calculating a very
reliable reputation. I'm having trouble seeing how the first and third
are
Hi Ray,
And Yahoo's better than MSN at having a live body resolve the issue...
Good luck. Hopefully, someone at Yahoo! Has heard you. :-)
-J
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Raymond L. Corbin
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 7:37 PM
To: S
My suggestion would be not even to try iptables. It'll take hours just
to load 10 million entries. There's no efficient mass loading interface.
-J
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 4:
Hey Y'all,
We're seeing a marked increase of spam originating from Earthlink mail
servers over the past week and a half. Is anyone else seeing a spike
localized to Earthlink as well?
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards,
Jason
---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, Dig
I believe it. We generate our own list with temporary (6 hour blocks),
and Earthlinks servers seem to be rolling on and off regularly.
-J
---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, DigiTar
http://www.digitar.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 208-343-8520
M: 208-863-0727
F: 208-322-8520
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Has anyone else noticed that the [NANOG] prefix has been missing
intermittently from the list traffic over the last couple of days?
-J
---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, DigiTar
http://www.digitar.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 208-343-8520
M: 208-863-0727
F: 208-322-8520
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Guess I missed it. I remember the announcement for the move from
merit.edu to nanog.org.
-J
---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, DigiTar
http://www.digitar.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 208-343-8520
M: 208-863-0727
F: 208-322-8520
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jim
Actually, I'm not subscribed to nanog-announce.
-J
---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, DigiTar
http://www.digitar.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 208-343-8520
M: 208-863-0727
F: 208-322-8520
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jim Popovitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n for the change.
-J
---
Jason J. W. Williams
COO/CTO, DigiTar
http://www.digitar.com
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 208-343-8520
M: 208-863-0727
F: 208-322-8520
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sam Stickland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 7:59 AM
To: Joe Abl
For BBQ, Rudy's is hard to beat:
http://www.rudys.com/
-J
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
william...@digitar.com
V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727
www.digitar.com
On Feb 16, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> is there a nanog austin eats page so
nters, the SSL VPN we
use for all of our road tunnels. SSL clients work great on WinXP, Win7 and OS
X. There's a new iPhone app as well for the web-based VPN.
-J
----
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/CTO
DigiTar
william...@digitar.com
V: 208.343.8520
F: 208.322.8522
M: 208.863.0727
www.digitar.c
We've been pretty happy with Pingdom. They do latency with all the
healthchecks...give pretty nice history graphs of latency and uptime.
They'll do automatic traceroutes when a check hard fails (I.e. 3 fails
from 3 different geographic locations).
-J
----
Jason J. W. Williams, COO/C
19 matches
Mail list logo
