On Oct 25, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Alex Thurlow wrote:
> I'm trying to find out if there are currently any resources available for
> teaching people how to be safe online. As in, how to not get a virus, how to
> pick out phishing emails, how to recognize scams. I'm sure everyone on this
> list know
-community/
--
J.D. Falk
Internet Standards & Governance
Return Path
ents (to whom we're
> trying to deliver via the email->SMS gateway).We're not sending ads,
> newsletters, or other such cruft.
That's probably why the mail is only being deferred (as you indicated on the
mailop list), rather than rejected outright.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
eb/the_web/article6169488.ece
(I don't even know where to start.)
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
een involved in that project
since before Trend took over. There's more information at
http://www.mail-abuse.com/.
(Full disclosure: I worked for the Mail Abuse Prevention System from 2000-2001.)
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
recommendations for
managing port 25 traffic a few years ago, and even then it had already been
a widely-accepted best practice for nearly a decade.
http://www.maawg.org/port25
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
arned with open relays at MAPS) pressure isn't very effective
unless there are tools available to deal with the problem.
http://www.maawg.org/about/publishedDocuments/MAAWG_Bot_Mitigation_BP_2007-07.pdf
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
Jack Bates wrote:
J.D. Falk wrote:
Hi, Luke! MAAWG recently published a document to help ISPs deal with
infected machines in their networks. It's not the same kind of
pressure, but (as we learned with open relays at MAPS) pressure isn't
very effective unless there are tools availab
else jumps
on the bandwagon.
Declan does that a lot. It's very annoying, but I suppose cnet has never
claimed to be an impartial news organization...or have they?
--
J.D. Falk
the membership application and other info.
--
J.D. Falk
Co-Chair, Program Committee
Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group
really not a better solution?
This sounds a lot like the conversations which led to the creation of the
original Realtime Blackhole List of spam sources. When was that, 1996?
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
year which includes some
additional recommendations:
http://www.maawg.org/about/publishedDocuments/MAAWG_Email_Forwarding_BP.pdf
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
John Levine -- they treat those complaints as
unsubscribe requests.
Yours is not the common use case.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
nan...@yorku.ca wrote:
I'm rsrching the Peering Wars of 1998...anyone able to provide info wd be
greatly appreciated.
MAE-East was knee-deep in blood. I still have nightmares.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
iscussion, if there
> could be some positive policy outcome.
Rather than expecting anti-spam researchers to lobby at ARIN & RIPE meetings,
perhaps ARIN & RIPE representatives could visit anti-spam meetings such as
MAAWG to ask how they can help?
I'd be happy to make some introductions.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
us
> trying to hunt people who can't realise what information is needed to do a
> proper abuse complaint.
Yep, that's certainly part of it.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
where the user can fill in fields and use drop-down menus to create the XML
> and the cut/paste this into an email and send. Question is how an end user
> should handle the reply they get, it'll be pretty much unreadable to the
> untrained eye.
Some types of conversations simpl
On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:45 PM, James Hess wrote:
> That said, XML makes a terrible data interchange format for
> communications where humans are supposed to understand the message,
> using standard software (such as a legacy e-mail client).
Exactly what we said when developing ARF
Does anyone know of a library, sample code, etc. to help Oracle PL/SQL do CIDR
math?
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
; need some help on getting mail to be delivering again to AOL.
>
> Didn't I read that all of the AOL Postmasters had beenwhat is the
> word this week...made redundant?
Most, but not all. You can reach those who remain via
http://postmaster.aol.net/, just as before.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
On Mar 26, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> This is the same fake conference spammer who's been hitting a lot
> of mailing lists and Usenet newsgroups -- best to blacklist the
> sender address and the domain.
Why is this fake conference still posting to NANOG?
--
J.D. Fal
guaranteed ROI or guaranteed FUD.)
--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
g.org rarely resulted in user complaints, and thus it must be mail the
users want to receive; conversely, mail which spoofs nanog.org but is not
signed can safely* be stored in the big bit bucket in the cloud.
--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions
* assuming nanog.org signs ALL mail -- but that's another long discussion
23 matches
Mail list logo
