Re: AS Numbers from a common 32-bit pool.

2010-12-20 Thread Heinrich Strauss
I'm kinda fearing this in South Africa, as we have a few large incumbents who aren't really driving -NG versions of protocols. They also have a "prove to us it's broken, and we may look at it in a few months' time"-attitude towards it. :O So 32-bit ASNs and IPv6 equally aren't really being dr

Re: AS Numbers from a common 32-bit pool.

2010-12-21 Thread Heinrich Strauss
On 2010/12/21 08:15, Matthew Palmer wrote: That would be why 32-bit ASNs have been "requestable" for the last couple of years(?); you could have been prodding providers with "it doesn't work, fix it" for a while now. - Matt Although I realise that, the problem in South Africa is that we esse

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward

2011-07-12 Thread Heinrich Strauss
On 2011/07/12 16:20, Grant Taylor wrote: Also, subscriptions that were set to no mail delivery are now delivering mail. Is this expected? I saw duplicate messages from an account that I had disabled (while testing NANOG volumes to a portable messaging device and forwarding to this account) and

Re: Microsoft deems all DigiNotar certificates untrustworthy, releases updates

2011-09-10 Thread Heinrich Strauss
On 2011/09/10 05:06, Michael DeMan wrote: Sorry for being ignorant here - I have not even been aware that it is possible to buy a '*.*.com' domain at all. I though wildcards were limited to having a domain off a TLD - like '*.mydomain.tld'. Given a private network and the need to monitor it i

Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters

2011-02-04 Thread Heinrich Strauss
Hi, NANOG. Something's just struck me: every IPv4 allocation over a certain threshold has a monetary cost (sometimes in the tens of thousands of USD) and according to our RIR, the first equivalent IPv6 allocation is given as a freebie (to encourage migration). (Disclaimer: I'm on the Dark Con

Re: Google and IPv6 inverse?

2011-06-06 Thread Heinrich Strauss
On 2011/06/06 18:38, r...@u13.net wrote: On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:19:37 +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote: Will Google have inverse working by June 8th? [hank@noc ~]$ traceroute6 ipv6.google.com traceroute to ipv6.l.google.com (2a00:1450:8001::68) from 2001:bf8:0:3:202:b3ff:feaf:f3fc, 30 hops max, 16