Hi,
Cable Cos do this in several ways.
Enabled hot spot on the cable provider cpe with separate ssid, sometimes the
same channel sometimes dedicated radio and channel (I prefer the same channel
as many areas have way too much noise). This hotspot service is using it's own
docsis channels and
Hi,
Glass and Copper (and aluminum) infrastructure is a natural monopoly,
similar to water service.
It was purely by chance IMHO that we ended up with Cable Co and Tel Co
internet competing with each other in many locations in the US.
That was aided by the following:
* Technology for TV o
Hi,
Startlink 1.0, probably will not have lower latency vs Fiber (either
cross country or across oceans)
Once the laser based inter-sat links are running (Starlink 2.0?), it
should be lower latency vs Fiber.
With ground stations only: https://youtu.be/m05abdGSOxY
With laser links: https://
Hi,
This is why I moved away from static black lists years ago. When the
68/8 and 24/8 blocks were released and tons of networks had it blocked
since it was "reserved" I observed and felt the pain.
My networks are small, and I rely on things such as fail2ban which auto
remove the blocks.
Hi,
I know of some enterprise IT equipment that does this. It was reserved space
at the time it was picked.
It does not leak from the box, but every once in a while one of these IPs show
up in a customer visible log, and causes confusion.
In ways it is better then rfc 1918 space as it has les
On 08/15/2015 09:44 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
The most viable solution, IMHO, is to require a separation between physical
infrastructure providers and those that provide services over that
infrastructure. Breaking the tight coupling between the two and requiring
physical infrastructure provider
6 matches
Mail list logo