On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 01:14:52PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > *Really*? It bakes the endpoint MAC into the IP? Well, that's miserably
> > poor architecture design.
> >
>
> It can and it is a common default. It is not required.
>
> It's actually rather elegant architecture design for the goa
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Brian Raaen wrote:
> The only issue with this is that the Linux box is not acting as a router, but
> as the egress devices. I'm trying to figure out how to properly get my
> application to 'color' the traffic. standard BSD sockets appear to have no
> concept
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> Or exec your commands wrapped in route -T$TABLE exec $*
FYI, on linux you can use 'ip netns exec'. The subcommand is rather
new and you will only find it in the git repository.
Greetings,
Hannes
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:39:26AM -0700, Kate Gerry wrote:
> I'm looking for a good utility that I can run locally to scrape RADB, ARIN,
> other RIRs to add to my or customer prefix lists... Anybody have a good tool
> for this? I currently end up visiting https://www.dan.me.uk/filtergen and
> c
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:09:40PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> <http://www.lexa.ru/snar/bgpq/index_en.html>
The url above links to the predecessor project. The code that I actually use
is available here:
<http://snar.spb.ru/prog/bgpq3/>
Greetings,
Hannes
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:29:30PM +, win...@team-metro.net wrote:
> I’m hearing reports of Google services (Search, Youtube, Mail, etc) going
> down all over the place, providing extremely spotty service. Works fine for
> me right now, but a lot of people seem to be having problems all over
Hello!
As the first IPv6 deployments for end-users are in the planning stage
in Germany, I realized I have not found any BCP for handling
addressing in those scenarios. IPv6 will make it a lot easier for
static address deployments but I wonder weather this is in the best
sense for the customers. A
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
>
> On 18 aug 2010, at 01:12, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>
>> prefer static addressing. But in the world of facebook and co. I
>> wonder if it would be a better to let the user have the choice. A
>
> What does
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> For people who want to use DNS and run services, they'll most likely want a
> static address/subnet that doesn't change in the first place (even though it
> should be handed out via DHCPv6-PD for ease). If someone wants to be
> anonymous
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> Haven't really thought about it before.
>
> One thing to consider is that unless the preferred and valid lifetimes
> of an IPv6 prefix are set to infinity, IPv6 prefixes are always dynamic
> - they'll eventually expire unless they're refreshed.
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
> They help because you're concerned about privacy. You didn't qualify
> that you're only concerned about privacy from geolocation services, so
> I described a mechanism that would provide you as much privacy as
> possible, while also being automa
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> Web portals work fine, and honestly, it's not like you need to switch
> subnets, either. PPPoE/A implementations work great, as they are already
> designed to utilize radius backends to quickly alter static/dynamic on a
> session. For bridging s
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Graham Beneke wrote:
> I have been asked to investigate moving an entire network to multi-hop on
> all the eBGP sessions. Basically all upstreams, downstreams and peers will
> eBGP with a route reflector located in the core. This RR will be some kind
> of quagga or
13 matches
Mail list logo
