"Ronald F. Guilmette" writes:
> My iPhone 3GS "goes on the Internet".
>
> Through no fauly of my own, it is also, apparently, destined in short order
> to "go onto" a landfill, if not here, then in China or India, where a
> pitiful plethora of shoeless and sad-eyed third-world waifs will spend
>
Keenan Singh writes:
> Hi Guys
>
> We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and are faced with extremely high Bandwidth
> costs, compared to the US, we currently use Peer App for Caching however
> with most services now moving to HTTPS the cache is proving to be less and
> less effective. We are currentl
Patrick van Staveren writes:
> This past Tuesday the 22nd I was witness to a widespread DNS poisoning
> problem in China, whereby a lot of DNS queries were all returning the same
> IP address, 65.49.2.178. Our websites became unavailable for most of our
> customers in China, as with many other w
Andrew Sullivan writes:
> I think DMARC is mostly useful when used correctly. There is no BCP
> yet...
There is, however, BCP167/RFC6377 covering DKIM and mailing lists.
Some relevant sections are 4.1 and 5.3:
4.1:
... site administrators wishing to
employ ADSP with a "discardable" setti
Chris writes:
> I'm interested to see what other people are doing for these types of small
> setups. Does anyone know of any other reasonably priced access switches,
> 32+ SFP ports, and able to withstand 60degC or higher operating temperature?
An alternative you might consider is a small A/C un
Miles Fidelman writes:
> Either way, if one is a customer of both, one will end up paying for
> the infrastructure - it's more about gorillas fighting, which bill it
> shows up on, who ends up pocketing more of the profits, and how many
> negative side-effects result.
In this case, though, this
"John Levine" writes:
> The public suffix list contains points in the DNS where (roughly
> speaking) names below that point are under different management from
> each other and from that name. It's here: http://publicsuffix.org/
>
> The idea is that abc.foo.com and xyz.foo.com have the same man
Pete Lumbis writes:
> Maybe related to the 512k route issue?
> http://www.bgpmon.net/what-caused-todays-internet-hiccup/
>
> I've seen people reboot to recover from TCAM exception without adjusting
> TCAM size only to run into the issue all over again. It's a fun way to
> watch the problems roll
chris writes:
> I have been going through something very interesting recently that relates
> to this. We have a customer who google is flagging for "abusive" search
> behavior. Because google now forces all search traffic to be SSL, it has
> made attempting to track down the supposed "bad traffic
Rich Kulawiec writes:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:09:00AM -0400, Ian Smith wrote:
> > This is the part that's been bugging me. Doesn't the NANOG server
> > implement SPF checking on inbound list mail?
>
> Don't know, but it doesn't matter: SPF has zero anti-spam value.
> (I know. I've studied
Jay Ashworth writes:
> UA, WSJ /and/ NYSE all in the same day?
>
> Once is an accident; twice is a coincidence...
>
> Three times is enemy action.
Or common factors.
In this case, I think it's probably enough to point out it's the first
Tuesday of the fiscal year. For a 24x7 organization, e
"Tony Hain" writes:
> Owen DeLong wrote:
> > I vote for a /24 lotto to get rid of the rest!
>
> That would take too long to get organized. Just suspend fees and policy
> requirements and give one to each of the first 400 requestors. Overall it
> would reduce costs related to evaluating "need", s
Robert Drake writes:
> On 7/17/2015 4:26 AM, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> > Well, this block also affects people who have old management hardware
> > around using such ciphers that are for example no longer supported. In my
> > case for example the old Dell DRAC's. And it seems there is no way to
>
"Darden, Patrick" writes:
> So, obviously, MPTCP can cause problems with Stateful Firewalls (as
> in asymmetric routing, out of state packets, etc.). Cisco's take on
> how to deal with MPTCP is just as interesting as MPTCP itself is.
...
It's not so much the statefulness of the firewall that's
Mark Andrews writes:
> In message , Chris Hills writes:
> > Whilst I am not a fan of dotless domains, as long as one uses the fully
> > qualified domain name (e.g. http://ac./), there should not be any
> > trouble using it in any sane software. It seems that most people aren't
> > aware these day
Cutler James R writes:
> On Sep 26, 2013, at 5:22 PM, Mark Lancaster wrote:
>
> > I have heard a lot of questions and debate about whether the iOS updates
> > download automatically:
> >
> > Available updates download automatically if your device is connected to
> > Wi-Fi and a power source.
16 matches
Mail list logo
