Hi John,
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
> I've been pondering IPv6 setups, and I don't understand how IPv6 rDNS
> is supposed to work. It's clear enough how you look up any particular
> address, but it's not at all clear to me what you put into an rDNS
> zone and how you put
Hello,
can anyone confirm why IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed should return 0 for aggregates
of 10 Gbit/s ports?
My google-foo led me to several topics on "use ifHighSpeed to 10 Gbit/s",
but none is clear on 10 Gbit/s aggregated.
So far I could only find references pointing to IEEE Std 802.1AX-2008
clause 6
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin <
fel...@starbyte.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can anyone confirm why IF-MIB::ifHighSpeed should return 0 for aggregates
> of 10 Gbit/s ports?
>
just to confirm what all those helpful souls told me off-list: most ve
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
> If you're on supported CPU's, the BSD's are likely to be a better
> choice if you want to avoid legal entanglements. Otherwise, if you
> don't mind code disclosure, Linux supports more platforms. Both
> are relatively mature, feature-full oper
Hey!
New message, please read <http://blueappledistributionhub.com/exclaimed.php?3io>
Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin
Hey!
New message, please read <http://magazinemuzic.com/leaving.php?7n1>
Felipe Zanchet Grazziotin
Hi,
you might find useful to see Nat Morris's presentation on "Anycast on a
shoe string".
He lists several VPS providers that do BGP for his project.
Here is one link:
http://www.slideshare.net/natmorris/anycast-on-a-shoe-string
Regards,
Felipe
On 7 December 2015 at 12:40, Philippe Bonvin via
Hi list,
this is my first post, so be nice. :)
Wondering about IPv6 deployments to end-users, imagine we deploy a full /48
address to each client.
How is the reverse DNS for each possible IPv6 address going to be?
Nowadays I'm used to do IPv4 reverse using old Class C, which has (up to)
256 entr
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:13 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:46 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> > For spoof resistance, how about doing a forward lookup on the
> > purported name and only installing it if it gets a matching
> > record?
>
> Sounds like a reasonable DDNS filtering
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:54 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Carl Rosevear wrote:
> > I don't understand why anyone thinks NAT should be a fundamental part of
> the v6 internet
>
> Perhaps the ability to change service providers without having to renumber?
>
Couldn't we us
10 matches
Mail list logo
