On 7/30/2012 12:04 PM, Panashe Flack wrote:
As a quick update, we've implemented some list settings last week to help to
keep spam off the list. New subscribers are moderated until we're comfortable
with their posts...
I dislike this change - how long are subscribers considered "new"?
I app
Jerry B. Altzman wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I've tried google, I've tried www.nist.gov, I've tried
postmaster/hostmaster/ab...@nist.gov, I've even tried the phone.
Could someone give me a pointer to a mail admin at nist.gov? I've been
having issues getting mail through to them from one of our servers.
Mike Lyon wrote:
Howdy,
I am curious what others in the industry think on this topic. When one
registers a domain they can put in their real information or they can use a
proxy, like Go-Daddy's Domains By Proxy.
Now, personally, I would prefer just to get a PO Box and put that address on
my do
Chris Gotstein wrote:
Anyone else seeing Google's Gmail down right now? Seems to have been
down since 10am CST. We are connected through Chicago.
downforeveryoneorjustme.com is also reporting it's down.
They're having an issue or two. Notably, the inability to display or
access Contacts, and
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Joe Abley wrote:
How about moving the meta-nanog themes in this thread to
nanog-futures, instead of adding to the noise on the main list?
Because nobody reads it?
You are mistaken, sir. There are plenty that read it, and meta
discussions belong there.
--
Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
Chris wrote:
Now to look at very affordable layer 2, Gigabit 3com switches with
good pps.
You should take a look at HP. They have very good gigabit switches and
also offer lifetime guarantee on them.
HP actually has a CLI to configure the switch, not the crap 3C
Randy Bush wrote:
On 08.12.24 12:43, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Matthew Black wrote:
I've had difficulties reaching anyone with a brain
at my DSL provider Verizon California.
Switch to a local ISP with local tech support.
bingo.
Uh, ditto? Having left SoCal a couple of years ago, my data is
Matthew Black wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:51:41 -0800
"Tomas L. Byrnes" wrote:
Cox Communications has fully on-shore support. Here in SD they are
actually LOCAL.
In Verizon land, residential customers do not have
CLEC voice or DSL alternatives. We do not have Cox.
Our area is served by
Roy wrote:
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
...However, I happily used XO+Covad in three separate locations
(in SoCal). DSLExtreme also has (or at least had) a good reputation.
Verizon sucks. In fact, since you are in the Long Beach area, they
suck even more than they do other places. Vote with your
Skywing wrote:
I find those speech recognition menus quite annoying. American
Airlines has one that's just not good enough over a lower bitrate
cell voice link in a crowded situation when you're trying to
determine what's the deal with cancelled flights or whatnot along
with everyone else in th
Neil wrote:
Do people here really so quickly forget things? There was a talk on
Carnivore given in 2000 at NANOG 20, IIRC, and I believe that one of the
instigating causes of that talk was problems that Earthlink had experienced
when the FBI had deployed Carnivore there.
Naturally. The NSA
Colin Alston wrote:
I even have a cabinet full of patch/cross-connect gear at one site. The
teleco took some of the NTU kit from it when it was cancelled, said they
would be back for the rest and 2 years later there it stands :)
Murpheys' law says the instant I tie it to the roof of my car, the
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 08:07:36AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
"They" will keep trying and until a vast majority of ISPs implement
maxas, this will keep happening.
Or until people who are still running multi-year old cisco code
actually upgrade? This seems to
13 matches
Mail list logo
